A fictitious George Orwell sent me an email this evening reminding me of an upcoming hearing on October 15, 2009. I had requested the hearing to correct an injustice committed against me by a fraud - Cyber #2 who was recently given a three year restraining order on September 23, 2009. Someone flew out from Vancouver Washington to testify they sent something I was accused of sending postmarked from there. I originally believed sworn affidavits were enough but it turned out only an appearance is considered real testimony.Since I obtained a restraining order against Cyber #2 with much effort of having to have two witnesses, it was rather pathetic the ease of which this fascist walked into his small town court with no evidence in failing to meet the statutory requirements. Without any counsel, Cyber #2 falsely accused me of stalking his ugly girlfriend 18 times. His evidence wasn't any police reports, since he didn't have any, but his perjury testimony. His other alleged evidence was what he scribbled on a piece of paper as follows:
This was the pathetic complaint of a mentally ill person of an alleged "threat" sent. This lazy note caused a slew of legal documents to be filed and of people to testify. The outcome is still pending of the initial filing.
Attorneys make money on this kind of thing and apparently the court is tryin
g to suck innocent people into the system with virtually no evidence. It's a real shame they think nothing of trying to ruin someone's life over a Pacific Heights type of nutjob's false accusations. I live in an entirely different county of this person and knew nothing of his girlfriend.
I recently learned Cyber #2 had the audacity to go file a police report against the process server who he chased out to his car after he was served. This is the server's declaration affidavit. 
A process server's declaration statement will be held with greater credence then Cyber #2's recent fraudulent criminal complaint accusing him of vehicular assault.
An attorney's letter was drafted on June 22, 2009 addressed to
Cyber #2's former name. When we learned there had been a name change it delayed
the letter's delivery weeks.
This is an evil game men play. It's interesting the extreme extent they go to cover-up their being rejected by a woman to make her look crazy and like a Glen Close Fatal Attraction character. This man had no evidence of my ever contacting him because I hadn't. An attorney from Parker Stanbury LLP had even drafted a cease and desist letter. Unlike Cyber #2, who committed perjury and covered up his cyber stalking activities as such, I was following the law all the way.
Now I have some nutjob George Orwell sending me more emails. The fact is, I am innocent of this vicious man's false accusations. He is a mentally ill Pacific Heights character role who two witnesses, including a former friend, can attest to as such.
So this is the perjury game this vicious individual Cyber #2 plays. Perjury is common in the courts. You have to present hard evidence, like depositions and IP addresses, etc., to prove your case over perjury these days.
Cyber #2 believes he can do anyone wrong he so pleases that he's above the law and he can lie and get away with it. . . ..for now.
For anyone who thinks because they use an anonymous proxy server service they can get away with sending threatening, rude and annoying emails and comments to blogs, think again! I was able to get a three year restraining order against Cyber #2 yesterday in Concord Superior Court. An outstanding judge listened attentively to two witnesses, a former friend and victim of Cyber #2, and the second a victim who flew all the way out from Vancouver Washington to testify. The hearing began with information my attorney couldn't make the hearing having been held up at a trial so I had to represent myself. An associate attorney was sent who was very helpful but he couldn't represent me there since he didn't really have all the information. I had to present the case and evidence to the judge myself. In addition to having two strong witnesses who explained their experiences with being victims of Cyber #2, I had also conducted a deposition prior to the hearing which proved helpful. Cyber 2 is the guy who chased the process server to his car I wrote about in a former post. My attorney gave me good advice it was worth the extra $400 to get the transcript rushed for the court date. The deposition made a huge difference as I was able to provide evidence of Cyber #2 admitting to certain key things, and evading certain questions with "no comment" that clearly pointed to his guilt of authoring Blog #2 of me. The blog cheryllicksass.blogspot.com was authored by Cyber #2. Its full of malicious libel and misinformation. The vicious man who wrote that blog now has a restraining order. His latest emails and other malicious activities threatening my now abandoned business were reviewed by a Judge who agreed there 
was cause for a restraining order. This RO includes emails and any kind of means of electronic harassment. Note to Cyber #1: Any anonymous and ficitious name harassment I get from the USENET board due to your writing about me and my case there, can be construed as your harassment. Take note of it and leave me the hell alone.
I just discovered Edmond Wollmann is writing materials on the USENET forum about my deposing him on September 15, 2009 showing how insecure he is. If his lawyer views this article, he should instruct his client to stop writing about his case on forums because I'm continually getting harassing emails about it forcing me to respond in this manner.
First, a little about Wollmann's appearance at the deposition. Edmond Wollmann is bald, overweight and pasty pale white, 
all very uncommon for those who live in the great weather and sunshine of San Diego. People who live in San Diego are generally there because they enjoy the weather tending to spend time outdoors jogging and enjoying the sunshine. Edmond Wollmann looks like something out of the Munsters television program. He struck me as fitting the characterization of an underground mole.
Mr. Wollmann insinuated someone has impersonated him on-line and he did not own the email address "ewollmann@aol.com" on May 23, 2007. The long string of evidence points to otherwise. He also claims he's never posted anything on USENET other than under his own professional signature. I'm currently working with an attorney to have a subpoena accepted in Virginia's court where AOL is located, in order to obtain the account information.
I can't imagine any man who would exploit his own son by asking him to be the videographer for a deposition in which he admitted to: - Having criminal convictions for trespassing & public nuisance
- Having never graduated high school
- Lying repeatedly in covering up his crazy behavior cyber stalking, harassing and abusing a woman on-line.
Any man who would invite his son, Nathan Wollmann, to videograph his deposition in which he repeatedly lied and had to admit to criminal behavior can be construed as indecent and immoral. The shame of involving one's son in covering up for one's self and involving him in videoing the plaintiff during questioning doesn't register with such a pathological individual.
So for the record, Edmond Wollmann, 55 was a high school drop out. Back in those days of his generation, being a high school drop out was an indication of some serious problems of an individual. It was the real stamp of a loser unless the individual had a military family. Being a high school dropout is where Edmond Wollmann's great insecurity with himself apparently began in which he feels it necessary to lie about and smear people on-line.
The Huge Divide Between Myself and Edmond Wollmann
There's a huge difference between myself and Edmond Wollmann that he's too delusional and pathological to recognize. Compared to Edmond Wollmann I received the following awards from one of the top high schools in the country I graduated from in Palos Verdes Estates, in 1974-78:
- Outstanding Freshman - PVHS Orchestra '75
- U.S.C. Music Camp Scholarship - PVHS Orchestra '76
- Outstanding Stylist - PVHS Jazz Choir '78
When I was in grade school I was playing viola with some of today's top musicians in youth orchestras in Hollywood, CA and later as a teenager at music camps.
I'm continually receiving harassing anonymous emails about Wollmann's posts on USENET and all kinds of crazy stuff.
It would be difficult having any father who lacks common sense not to know when enough is enough. It takes a lot of stupidity in this day and age for a non-homeless well fed clothed educated person to get a public nuisance conviction in San Diego California. Such a person who received a public nuisance conviction was Edmond Wollmann in 2003. Wollmann actually had two counts against him as one was dropped.
A normal son of such a person might think the following to himself watching his father have to answer questions he was also asked to video tape at a deposition for him:
"Yup, that's my dad alright, the criminally convicted public nuisance. He's been convicted of trespassing and obsessively writes crazy things on USENET that's gotten him various kook awards. He calls Pluto a planet and the constellation Orion a star in his historical (i.e., hysterical) writings. He writes his own shining Amazon reviews for his self-published book. He'll even file a Google copyright violation for posting his email as if you've copied a literary giant's writing material. Yes, my father is quite desperate to save face and impress me." - Family Video Series #1
It's no wonder Edmond Wollmann is very sensitive to what his son, Nathan Wollm
ann, thinks of him that he feels a need to obsessively personally attack and lie about others on the Internet for his honor. "My son's my best friend" Wollmann writes. "He video taped the Merrill deposition." No, Mr. Wollmann, it wasn't the Merrill deposition, it was the Wollmann deposition. You were the one deposed, not me. Your recent publicly stated written opinions of me during the deposition have absolutely zero relevance in the matter other than adding to my discovery.
Wollmann's personal insecurities with saving face with his son have been unlawfully transferred onto me in this matter. He needs to stop sending me anonymous accusatory emails and posting his libelous garbage on USENET trying to beat up on a woman on-line.
Here's a glimpse of a typical email I get from a perverted sick man: 
I get several dozen anonymous rude emails like the one above each month many of which I believe are generated by Edmond Wollmann.
I recently received a typical accusatory email and wanted to respond I voluntarily removed links to Edmond Wollmann's conviction cases on this blog. I don't want his crimes searchable on Google linked with my songchannels.com music site.
The PDF files were stored on songchannels and Docutur.com. Docutur kept getting hacked into as the other place I stored them. I decided to simply no longer list the cases, especially since I have Mr. Wollmann's statement under oath now admitting he was convicted of trespassing and public nuisance. His concealed firearm charge was apparently dismissed.
I was performing analytical tests on my site's searchability and discovered people who weren't searching for music were coming to my site. Google picks up PDF text in its search engine and I don't want songchannels.com's searches to produce results for such key words as "San Diego Superior Court" and other similar related searches that have nothing to do with music. So, I took down the cases from songchannels voluntarily along with several others. As far as Wollmann's Google copyright DMCA complaint about my posting a copy of this email in a blog article, I'm challenging it as erroneous and waiting for Google to give me the okay to repost it.
Last night I discovered there was no Bart train going to the San Francisco Airport early enough for my Virgin America flight to Los Angeles that left at 7:10 am. I had presumed a train would be available on Saturday morning prior to 6:00 a.m. in vain. So I was forced to hustle in trying to find an alternative which required I wake up at 3:45 a.m. to catch the appropriate shuttle bus. A taxi ride is around $40 to the airport these days so it was worth it, since the fare was only $3.50.
I arrived at the Transby Terminal in San Francisco at 4:45 a.m in the morning to discover homeless people sleeping in the terminal and hanging around wit
h cups of coffee. I got on the shuttle and arrived at the airport at 5:50 a.m. I walked on the entire other side of the airport to the gate assigned to the Virgin aircraft and got a cup of coffee. Luckily as I approached the security check line I discovered in time Virgin America, as usual, had changed gates last minute to the entire other side of the terminal requiring me to walk what would amount to several city blocks.
When I arrived Virigin America wasn't ready for the passengers. It took a long time to check us all onto the plane due to what they claimed was an aircraft change. We sat on the plane for another 35 minutes waiting for catering to finish up loading the plane with food. We were already 30 minutes late in the flight, then waited for the runway to clear about another 15 long minutes. Since I had a conference to attend early in the morning I was totally pissed.
When we finally arrived in Los Angeles LAX, we were 40 minutes late. I told the Virgin crew on my way out it was the worst flight I had ever had in my life. The airline hostesses were shallow and dumb and no one seemed to care how late they were to get us to Los Angeles. The pilot rarely checked in with us to update status on arrival time.
At LAX, the taxi driver they assigned to me at the terminal didn't even know where the hotel was I asked for. He brought me to the wrong area and then delayed my arrival another 15 minutes. We drove and drove as is typical of LA getting nowhere and I was reminded why I had left; Los Angeles is pure hell! The driver used his special virtual dashboard map and was completely ignorant of where the hotel was I needed to go to. Because Virgin America had limited flights back to LA, I had to leave the conference early, meaning I had flown all the way to Los Angeles for a mere 5 hours of conference time.
On the way back I met a very cool architect with his own architecture firm. He was sitting next to me and we talked about so much stuff from architecture to the economy. Speaking of architecture, the LAX terminal hasn't changed since I last visited, it was a real piece of work. Apparently they were working on it again, but it still looked the same as the day I left LA in 1995. It looked just as it always had and I was shocked; utterly shocked LAX hadn't redesigned itself. The entire airport is outdated and pathetic.
I think SFO is one of the nicest airports in the world compared to some I've recently visited including Las Vegas and San Diego. SFO is thus far the nicest airport I've ever been too. I think I'm going to go travel to Italy and Rome next.
Raymond Clark, III, 24, had a bright future ahead in life with a good education, fiancee and a love for his dog. Witnesses said he was a nice man and his former peers remember him as a comedic clown in class. So, let's face it, this guy doesn't fit the stereotype of one you'd expect to have committed the brutal crime and cover-up of Yale graduate Annie Le. My head's been spinning all day after I heard the news the killer was arrested.I would have guessed the nature of the individual who could have strangled and stuffed a beautiful little woman into a wall would have fit the bill for a former prison convict, rapist or drug dealer with a motive. However, witnesses allege he merely seemed a control freak who may have felt Annie Le had violated his workspace territory. A guy with a similar mental problem on a lesser level might have considered concocting some story against Le so he could get a restraining order. This guy Clark just decided to get her out of the way and stuff her in a wall, then hide as the authorities ran their tests.
This sounds like something out of a horror movie really, to imagine a normal kind of guy like this suddenly flipped out that some pretty little thing was in his way in the workplace. Whatever happened to cause this man to flip out, it's a testimony that anything can happen and the dangerous looking person on the street is far less dangerous than Raymond Clark III was one particular day. It's true the ones you'd never expect, the clowns in high school as this guy was, can have a dark side to them.Authorities say they have overwhelming forensic evidence to overcome any lack of motive for the gruesome murder of Annie Le. Clark also wasn't too bright considering he had to swipe his magnetic card to get into rooms in the building where he was tracked.Clark had moved around the laboratory area quite a bit that day, including entering rooms that he normally would not be expected to enter, the source said.
Clark also used his card to go to another area, the place where Le's body was found Sunday -- the day she was to have been married -- stuffed into a 2-foot crawl space behind a wall. - LA Times.
This kind of shocking murder event is really getting to be an epidemic in our country. I don't understand why these guys who seem to have so much going for them suddenly flip out and feel a need to do something so brutal. Maybe they wouldn't even contemplate their crime if they didn't think they could get away with it? What caused this guy Raymond to think he could get away with something like this?
This just proves my case that the nicest sweetest guy in the world can be a brutal murderer on the inside. What an utterly shocking and disgracefully sad story.
I recently read the #1 New York Times bestseller Liberal Fascism and couldn't agree more with Jonah Goldberg's assessment. Some people who claim to be liberal ARE fascists who apply a double standard, one set for them and their friends and another set for the others. Liberals claim to be the side that upholds the First Amendment but I find that not to be true at all. Many only value their own rights of free expression.I've been accused by cyber stalkers who set up libelous blogs accusing me of being a racist, among other things, simply because I referred to people as "Asians" or "African Americans" in some of my articles. I believe being in denial of people's race and cultural origin is kind of evil in itself. If you can't acknowledge another person's cultural heritage and associated race that comes from ancestral migration from another part of the world, then in effect, that's much like claiming gays and lesbians don't exist either.
All races would be "closeted" under such racial denial for fear of being different from the amalgamated masses. It's like not being able to ask "are you Italian?" because someone has a heavy accent. "OMG, Italian? We're all one! We're all the same, what are you asking me, are you a racist?" What's wrong with delineating a person's cultural heritage and ancestral geographical migration orientation? Why are fascist liberals trying to make it taboo to delineate people's cultural origins? Based on cyber #2's assessment of me, I'm not supposed to acknowledge anyone as an African American or Asian in my articles because this denotes a form of racism. I actually think they're racist to be making an issue of it at all. If I were racist, I wouldn't be living in one of the most diverse cities in the world in San Francisco the past 16 years, I'd be out in the suburbs sheltered in such places as Walnut Creek California. If I were a racist, I wouldn't have lived with an African American lady for three years under the same roof without ever having called the police on her regardless of opportunities she presented to do so. If I were a racist I wouldn't appreciate nor enjoy many Motown groups of mostly African Americans I grew up listening too. Most all of my favorite groups and female vocalists were from the era I grew up listening to are African American. I've had dates with wealthy black men back in the 80's, dated including a film editor for Norman Lear. The cybers' ridiculous claims I'm a racist comes from their own racist beliefs of which they attempt to politically ostracize. If you can't even acknowledge others' cultural heritage claiming it doesn't really exist, that's a form of denial and racism in itself in my opinion.
A fictitious George Orwell sent me an email this evening reminding me of an upcoming hearing on October 15, 2009. I had requested the hearing to correct an injustice committed against me by a fraud - Cyber #2 who was recently given a three year restraining order on September 23, 2009. Someone flew out from Vancouver Washington to testify they sent something I was accused of sending postmarked from there. I originally believed sworn affidavits were enough but it turned out only an appearance is considered real testimony.
This was the pathetic complaint of a mentally ill person of an alleged "threat" sent. This lazy note caused a slew of legal documents to be filed and of people to testify. The outcome is still pending of the initial filing.
g to suck innocent people into the system with virtually no evidence. It's a real shame they think nothing of trying to ruin someone's life over a Pacific Heights type of nutjob's false accusations. I live in an entirely different county of this person and knew nothing of his girlfriend.
A process server's declaration statement will be held with greater credence then Cyber #2's recent fraudulent criminal complaint accusing him of vehicular assault.
An attorney's letter was drafted on June 22, 2009 addressed to
