Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Cyber Stalkers Are Masters At Hiding Their True Identities

I believe in order to maintain their warped lifestyles, cyber stalkers are required to make sure their identities are protected at all costs. This means no one should be surprised they have mastered hiding their identity behind various means and tricks. The various levels one must go through to get to the bottom of true identities is mind boggling.

It boggles the mind the time and energy these cybers put into their craft. I was talking with someone last night and we both agreed they find their craft entertaining. One of their objectives with me was clearly to drive me insane and enjoy such a process of torment.

Stay tuned. . . a few key events are coming up ahead for this case. I'll be posting the info this week. I'm intensely busy.

Monday, February 1, 2010

An Innocent Cyber Stalker? Humpf!

If one were to believe Cyber #1, someone wrote me with the email "Ewollmann@aol.com" in May, 2007, that was once his AOL account long ago. That is, someone took such an account to impersonate him in order to cause havoc in his life.

After this person sent me a lawsuit threat message in ALL CAPS "take my email off of your blog OR I WILL SUE YOU!", they went on a rampage with my name all over the USENET astrology forum with dozens of egregious postings designed to show up in the Google search engine. That was just the beginning of a 2 1/2 year on-line rampage of me by a complete stranger.


This alleged impostor of Cyber #1 brilliantly mirrors his victim's psychological profile by writing with his well documented style and behavioral patterns. Yet, when push comes to shove and Cyber #1 has the authority and power to subpoena his impostor for his identity what does he do? He actually works with the impostor's attorney to hide his identity! Revealingly, the cyber also writes AOL explaining to them his predicament and that he has no desire to know who his alleged impostor is!


Cyber #1 has convinced himself he's covered since AOL confirmed in writing he does not own "Ewollmann@aol.com" (in reality, no one does nor has since June of 2007) and that he "has not owned such an account for the past two years". Cyber #1 then begins presenting this as "evidence" he is innocent. The only problem is, the last two years of the AOL letter doesn't cover May, 2007, only October 2007 as the cut off time.

I don't know about anyone else, but if someone caused a lawsuit to be filed against me acting as my impostor, I would subpoena that person's identity immediately to prove it wasn't me. I wouldn't work with that person's attorney to cover up who that person is so approvingly. Had Cyber #1 submitted a subpoena for AOL to reveal the identity of the "Ewollmann" account holder, he could have theoretically vindicated himself. Yet, he has expressed in writing to AOL he has no interest in knowing who that alleged impostor is!

If I wanted to file a lawsuit against an innocent man for the purpose of harassment and torment, which is Cyber #1's allegation, I wouldn't choose such an impoverished pathetic individual with a mobile home in Los Lunas, New Mexico who has virtually no assets. One generally doesn't choose impoverished people to file lawsuits against for money these days.

The bottom line is, the level of insanity of these individuals really reveals itself in the degree they go to cover-up their true identities.

The alleged impostor's attorney has filed a Motion to Quash my subpoena.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

I Love Regus Businessworld's Spirit of Freedom!

I've been an office worker since I graduated high school in 1978 with the exception of working at the Front Desk of the Marriott hotel at LAX for a year. What this means is that I've felt overwhelmingly chained to an office desk space for nearly 30 years. This means I've been required to always be on time and at my desk an average of 7 hours or more a day.

For the past 10 years working at law firms, where I worked hundreds of hours of overtime, being required to be at my desk space was even more intense. Such is why when I discovered a new lifestyle, of having my own businesses using the Regus Businessworld lounges, I discovered for the first time in my life a sense of freedom in the business world.

Thanks to Regus, I'm no longer required to go to the same office each day, with the same people and petty politics. Now people call me from all over the city (and even from other states!) and tell me which Regus office they'd like to meet at. These aren't your typical kind of offices either, these are top notch stylish offices with nice views of San Francisco and the bay.

Just like a typical corporation, Regus has coffee and tea condiments available for its members. Suddenly, I find there's no boss, no petty politics, no real time demands, while the nice office, coffee, and many professional nice people are still there! At some of the Regus offices there's even a MAC to use.

Take for instance one of my favorite business locations at One Market, Spear Tower, on the 36th floor. This particular office allows its Business World Gold Card Members a large conference meeting room with a huge window overlooking San Francisco Bay. I recently had a meeting with an affiliate business representative in one of the offices. It's a great backdrop for any meeting. Regus also offers its Gold Card Members coffee and tea for their customers. There's a two customer at a time limit however.


For those looking for a way to break free from the traditional business world, Regus Businessworld is a good way to start-up your business on the cheap. When business grows, Regus offers other packages as well. For now I only pay $90 a month for two business addresses at a prestigious location. When you have a virtual office package, Regus even offers a FREE Gold Member Card that includes access to a free wireless connection. I had actually started with Regus first paying for the Gold Card because I didn't know it was free with the virtual office package.

Regus Businessworld is a great way to network and meet independent business owners. They have offices all over the world Gold Card Members can use.

Regus

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Cyber Stalking Slumlord

I was wondering about the kind of company that would employ someone with the caliber of character of Cyber #1 as its building manager. I found what was overwhelmingly very bad reviews of such a company. I thought I'd post just a few of them from this review site.

When one stands up to criminals and people of lowly sleazy character, one often pays a price. Such individuals will commonly lash out, lie, call you unethical and overall give you a hard time. In the case of such nasty individuals one just has to keep moving forward with the facts.


One can certainly hope this management company doesn't use their cyber stalker, public nuisance employee to torment their tenants. God only knows what should happen if one of the tenants ever rises up against a sleazy slumlord manager. What kind of bullying, intimidation and humiliation might they possibly face?

"Sunrise Management" is "Slumrise Management"

by yankeeholiday at Citysearch

I cannot describe this management company without using all of the words forbidden by this service. I will only say that once you are under a lease with this company you are on your own. The law of the jungle rules in your apartment complex. They basically do not care what goes on in the apartment as long as they get the rent. Then you try to talk to the owners to tell the owners what is going on and they will not tell you who the owners are. This has got to the worst management company in the world. Do not get involved with them or you will be sorry. It is a living hell.

  • Pros: good if you are a terrible tenant
  • Cons: everything about them

NOT A GOOD COMPANY AT ALL!

by jacis1039 at Citysearch

NOT A GOOD COMPANY AT ALL! VERY NON CARING COMPANY, WHERE TENANTS ARE CONCERNED. BAD DECISIONS ALL THE TIME REGARDING RESIDENTS.

  • Pros: NOT A GOOD COMPANY AT ALL!
  • Cons: NOT A GOOD COMPANY AT ALL!


Property Managers who break the laws to make the buck

by MadRenter at Citysearch

This company is all about the bottom dollar. The regional managers (especially Tracy Walker) treat the tenants like second class citizens. If you have a complaint, when the phone is finally answered, they turn it back on you. I had a dispute regarding a payment, one I had proof had been made, and Tracy put a 3 day notice on the door dated 2 days before she actually had it posted. By 9 am the next day I was told there was nothing I could do, the eviction had already been filed. When I requested the name of the owner of the building I was told that Sunrise was advised to no longer speak to me. All this because I reported their company for code violations.

  • Pros: I no longer live there
  • Cons: I, like 1/4 of their previous tenants now how an eviction on my record

Its all about the money to them, and when they are ready you are gone in a flash.

by jbarnes92104 at Citysearch

When you move into their properties dont do so with the expectation that they will follow the laws as far as renting go. Properties are not fixed, they do not give notice before entering, and they will try to get money from you any way they can. Dont try and complain about anything or you will get a 30 days notice.

  • Pros: There are one or two good people in the company
  • Cons: they dont answer their phones, and the regional managers lie and yell all the time.

Senior Dilemna

by Laine09 at Citysearch

Most seniors need affordable housing, especially when they must live alone. Now that there is no COLA, there should NOT be yearly increases on rent at The Orchard Apartments on Hancock Street. This is the main reason I changed my mind about renting from a greedy management company, such as yours!

  • Pros: Grow Your Own Garden
  • Cons: Rent Increases (Yearly)

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A Cyber Stalker Needed His Meds Today

As 10 year olds are blogging to raise money for the Haitian disaster victims, here's another example of what this mentally ill cyberstalker is writing about me lately. Yes, I have myself donated to Haiti recently. I've also gotten up to page 19 of my notary journal with my first 100 notarizations as a public servant. Shame on this creepy cyber stalker for what he does with his time! Read on because you won't believe what this cyber stalker's calling the public to do against me and my alleged criminality and fraud.

My Alleged Fraud Businesses, Imaginary Business Offices, Etc.
Among Cyber #1's many crazy allegations, he claims my businesses are all frauds. He also alleges I have a mail drop for an office, yet I work at the alleged mail drop and all over the city at Regus Offices. I'm a Gold Card Member at Regus having access to meet with clients all over the city at their business lounges.

Being a mobile notary, I also have virtual offices for two business, meaning I pick up mail there and can lawfully use the address as my business office. Besides, I do actually work there at times. They have small offices in their business lounge their members can use, a perfect place for me to notarize documents. Attorneys also use Regus offices, it's not a crime. You can rent offices by the hour as well. There's nothing unlawful or underhanded in using Regus offices to conduct one's business! People use Regus facilities all over the world. It's a cool way of conducting business.

The address she gives on her websites is just a maildrop. It is also an address for Regus Meeting Facilities, HLM Venture Partners, Incyte Capital LLC, and the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANIES.

This guy is also inspiring the public to complain about me to the various associations I'm a member of and to "get me off the streets". This is an example of mentally ill Nazi fascism if there ever was. It's an example of someone who thinks I shouldn't be able to conduct business and live a life in America for whatever reasons he deems are justified. This is an example of an anarchist who has his own court of law for me.

"COMPLAIN to the City of San Francisco about this woman."
"Is that the way an ethical Notary acts? [you mean, by filing valid lawsuits against anonymous defaming posters such as yourself? [Note: Wollmann's Motion to Strike Entire Complaint was Denied on May 5, 2010] Yes! I'm a public servant professional who detects fraud and identity theft] Is that the way a SANE person acts? SFPD please take this maniac off the streets! SHEESH!" [A psychopath can't comprehend people change, life changes over time. You can't hold a notary public hostage in your perverted court of nonsense].

7. Does the County and City of San Francisco know of Merrill's virulent anti-gay and anti-lesbian diatribes? [Talk about delusional!! OMG, this guy is so off his rocker writing this stuff - he's clearly in need of meds}

If CALDA, NNA, the Women's Network of Entrepeneurs, and Lawyers & Legal Professionals using JD Supra, etc. didn't know about her history, criminal records, and overall paranoid, obsessive, unethical and sickening behavior, they will now. Merrill seeks "dirt' on attorneys who respond to her frivolous complaints. [this is really revealing since it shows the individual is clearly involved in the dispute to write such a thing.] She would be a hypocrite if she didn't welcome all these organizations being made aware of all the "dirt" on her.
This man is clearly jealous. This is an example of a Nazi fascist who believes I have no rights that I should be ejected from my domicile city and that people should storm troop in protest of me, my business(es) and carry me off somewhere. This is what men did to women in the dark ages, carrying them off to burn at the stake over their imaginary beliefs.

The guy who keeps writing this stuff should consider it ends up here on this blog for visitors to evaluate for themselves along with factual evidence provided about my two lawsuits. To see how a cyber operates to defame his victims, check out the testimony of the Court Hearing Transcript. It shows how these guys write anonymously about their victims with extreme contempt of their being alleged criminals.

The recent posts were created with an anonymous proxy program and the cowardly cyber uses Windows NT 5.1 - this is evidence I can u
se regardless:

Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="Xf6cJybu9vpcJn9EABPKgQ";
logging-data="24692"; mail-complaints-to=
"ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fJiPiZQpALStPx7lEmIMk"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; I; Windows NT 5.1; en-
EU; rv:1.8.1.4)


Each cyber punk's post also gets rated and responded to with factual information of the true state of reality, as well as reported to Google for posting my home address information. Cyber #1 has a restraining order hearing scheduled March 12. Cyber #2 already has a restraining order he received on September 23, 2009. Both cyber punks are defendants in two separate lawsuits. Those are the facts!


The National Notary Association always acts for the public good during times of disaster asking its notaries to donate to such tragedies such as the Haitian earthquake.
It's so sad people are struggling for their lives in Haiti while such a parasite as this cyber has a dark hedonistic primal urge to spend his time maligning complete strangers on-line rather than doing something good on behalf of others. Mr. Cyber loves to feel that burning sensation within his hedonistic anti-soul that he's got power and control over his victim.

The Court will be doing a Google search to view the fruits of this cyber's labors and assessing damages accordingly thereof.

Americans Sign Petition to Repeal First Amendment



Since I've been summoned within the past few months to two courts outside my domicile that have no personal jurisdiction over me (Walnut Creek and San Diego, CA), over my First Amendment Rights to post on my blog about cyber stalkers, I thought this video was appropriate. Judges are clearly abusing their discretion to harass bloggers over their First Amendment Rights.

Considering I never contacted Cyber #2, that there were no police reports whatsoever, and Cyber #1 had much similar circumstances, it does appear the First Amendment is under attack and judges appear to be using restraining orders, in which they are given much discretion, to attack people's First Amendment Rights. What this means is anyone can walk into their local court and lie about someone and the court will oblige to summon such person 500 miles away. The good news is you can sue them for damages later if you can prove their misrepresented and lied to the judge.

George Orwell's 1984 Alive and Well in the U.S.
Basically, when I stood up to these cyber punks, they went to the local authorities with various lies and false allegations after they butchered my name on-line accusing me of being a criminal among other things. Both cybers also admit going to the FBI! The two courts granted these cyber punks full rights to bring me into court based on their perjury in spite of my protesting its having no personal jurisdiction outside my domicile. Judges are ignoring the "forum non-inconeviens" jurisdiction protest making excuses based on another's fraud to deny it.

Americans often confuse the First Amendment with things such as defamation. Defamation isn't a First Amendment Right and is unlawful. What they cyber punks do is first set up their victim using anonymous defamatory posts, then they walk into the local authorities hoping they will conspire with them against their victim. It's a guys thing, like they have this secret male code of honor of "hey bro, read up on this witch! Help me make my dream come true to make her a criminal!"

So, basically what these unlawful "big brother" Orwelian cyberstalkers have thus far successfully demonstrated is how they can give their victim a hard time by summoning them into a court of law far away, based on perjury and fraud. What they didn't count on for me is that I have the time, resources and legal knowledge to ultimately defeat them.
The average person wouldn't stand a chance dealing with these cybers. Few can afford the attorney fees let alone have the necessary time and patience.

Thus far two California judges have demonstrated they have no regard for the U.S. Constitution, including summoning someone in protest under forum non-conveniens 500 miles outside one's domicile over baseless accusations over one's blog posts. It's fortunate judge #2, appointed by the infamous widely held incompetent Governor Schwarzenegger, was taken completely out of the situation being transferred to a new court. I was able to get my case heard first in another court nearby where I can appear telephonically rather than being forced on a plane to testify in person.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Edmond Wollmann's Subpoena to SkepticTank.org

I recently noted SkepticTank.org has updated its article Does Astrology Cause Insanity?" which included many references and email posts of Edmond Wollmann.

In spite of Wollmann's recent crazy subpoena to it, SkepticTank.org isn't intimidated by phony copyright infringement threats as some of the other sites have been.
I've noted a few of my blog's former links are now broken due to people being intimidated to remove information. Edmond Wollmann can be considered a public figure for having a book on Amazon while having also been on television programs in the 1980's. Wollmann's posts, emails and letters can easily be referenced under "fair use" copyright laws.

I don't necessarily agree that astrology causes insanity but the article is worth noting. If one scrolls down the article, one can see how Edmond Wollmann contacted the FBI complaining about his website being dislodged at the top of the search engines and all kinds of bizarre delusional paranoid type of stuff.

Here's a small blurb from the article.
It would be interesting to see if belief in astrology for long periods of time can cause paranoid delusions or expressions of other cognitive difficulties. Such an academic study might be able to explain astrologers who express unusual notions such as Mr. Edmond H. Wollmann's unfortunate public comments. Take a glance at this particular quote provided under the terms of "Fair Use" directly from one of Mr. Wollmann's many Internet web pages.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Court Transcripts of Restraining Order Hearing Revealing

I had my day in court against Cyber #2, a complete stranger, back on September 23, 2009 and it was a clear route of a man in complete denial. I recently paid $300 for a court transcript to support my complaint for damages in a lawsuit.

Back in July, 2009 while I was enjoying a rare vacation in Las Vegas, Cyber #2 walked into a small town judge claiming I had allegedly sent some non-threatening document to him from Vancouver, Washington. He also claimed I had stalked his
girlfriend (50+ years old) 18 times, and that I posted about him on the Internet. The later was the only thing that was partially true.

It's true I had posted articles about Cyber #2 in some minimal capacity, but only under First Amendment Rights due to his activities against myself and his other victims who contacted me. I had done nothing unlawful whatsoever. If Cyber #2 believed what I wrote was defamatory, he sh
ould have filed a lawsuit complaint as such instead of claiming I had harassed him. I never contacted Cyber #2 except once in 2006 by email, and didn't know anything about his girlfriend.

The Walnut Creek Superior Court was in complete error to violate my First Amendment Rights and summon me to another city over this matter. Especially when I had initially contested its jurisdiction and under forum non-inconveniens! It should have been dismissed on the spot when I showed up protesting jurisdiction. Instead they wanted to reschedule. No way! The court continually overstepped the U.S. Constitution in requiring no evidence of contact related harassment, including not requesting any real police reports from Cyber #2 he claimed to have filed.



Cyber #2's Reemergence After Name Change in 2007
When the cyber sent me an anonymous threatening message through my new music site in May, 2009, I traced it to the Apple Computer Store in Walnut Creek. Apple conducted an investigation and told me there was a name change. I then contacted an attorney through my Pre-Paid Legal Plan, Ricardo Mercado of Parker Stanbury LLP
for a cease and desist letter. It took the law firm several weeks to produce the final draft letter, then we learned of the name change, so the entire process was stalled about a month. Prior to my sending the letter, Cyber #2 applied for a RO claiming I had harassed him. This even after he sent me an anonymous postcard among other things.
This was the alleged dangerous threat made to Cyber #2, the Walnut Creek Super Court deemed fit for a Temporary Restraining Order - A letter postmarked from Vancouver Washington I was accused of sending. Our court system's becoming a farce with this kind of activity from cyberstalkers trying to frame their victims.

It takes a lot to stand up to cyberstalking criminals who hide behind anonymous ID's who viciously sabotage their victims. This court transcript reveals how two other parties experienced the same mean spirited vicious activities I did.


Cyber Stalker's Vulnerabilities
In evaluating the greatest vulnerabilities of these cyber stalkers who pose anonymously to do their dirty deeds, I'd have to say their claim of complete innocence and victimization by their victims has got to be a huge gapping problem for them in a court of law. Their denials and lack of self reflection demonstrate they have a mental disorder of some sort. Their delusions also tend to present themselves in a court of law by means of various discovery.

My Duty as an American Citizen to Protest
Lastly, it's my duty as an American citizen to protest whenever the government oversteps the U.S. Constitution to violate one's First Amendment Rights. Basically, Cyber #2 was able to have the court summon me to another jurisdiction to address what really comes down to my blog article disclosures of his unlawful victimization of myself and two other victims. These few articles were well within my rights. I was also falsely accused of posting materials another party posted long ago.

I recently had a legal document assistant tell me her application on behalf of a client for a temporary restraining order against a registered sex offender recently released from prison, a former husband, was not granted. Go figure what's wrong with our court system. They require an enormous amount of evidence to protect victims of real criminals, while they allow psychos like Cyber #2 the scantiest farce of information to get a temporary restraining order against their victim.


Court Hearing Transcript 

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Scary Times; Defendant Astrologer Requests My Time of Birth

Here's more discovery for my case. This was posted a while ago on October 13, 2009.

http://www.nntpnews.net/f559/re-cheryl-merrills-birth-data-11833032/

It starts out:

On Oct 13, 4:52*am, Lou Seffer <7thcir...@downbelow.net> wrote:
> Edmond Wollmann lied:


> > I live in a gated community,


> Nice delusions of grandeur, kook. You live in a shitty apartment complex
> with a fence around it.


> > if someone comes to my gates they must
> > state who they are and their purpose, if they lie and don't identify
> > themselves, I don't have to let them in.


> Right. I'll bet you have a moat around your "castle" too.


> All those incredible defenses, such unbeatable security, and yet you
> still got SERVED, you lying dumbfuck.


Evidently the server breached the gates illegally by tresspassing, or unlawfully entered by following a tenant in while the gate was open. Either way all he did was stuff it in my door, he never identitified himself.

*****

There are dozens of pages of posts on this site's thread, one in which EW dwells on the alleged imposter who sent me emails trying to frame him for writing me. Someone took the posts and transferred them onto www.NNTPnews.net, which is the Global Usenet Archiver. More info for my discovery.

Then there's this one:

http://www.nntpnews.net/f191/cheryl-merrills-birth-data-11490784/

Will this guy ever knock this stuff off? I once even offered him money to get over it! Then when he didn't respond to my cease and desist letters I filed a lawsuit. I then offered him a settlement agreement after he took down his blog and all he had to do was agree to stop posting stuff under my name. He prefers to obsess over me and try to find out my astrological information details.

Here are some other examples of recent defamatory posts of an extremely jealous, vicious man who can't stop posting malicious materials. I was fully background checked by the government three times already, yet this man wants to hold me hostage in his own court of law because he's an anarchist.

Example of Recent Defamation
#1
Example of Defamation #2


What kind of reasonable individual would post in the midst of having a lawsuit filed against him for the Plaintiff's time of birth data? Who in their right mind?


Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Swarm of Earthquakes at Yellowstone National Park Intensifies

My browser keeps shaking away from Yellowstone National Park earthquakes. The past three days there's been a whopping 424 earthquakes at the park. The last one happened just minutes ago when I wrote this article and was the largest at, a 3.6. (I know because my FireFox browser was shaking wildly.)

This "swarm" as they call it, has come after an 11 months of quiet seismic activity. The most devastating earthquake in recent history in Yellowstone was in 1959 and a magnitude of 7.3.

According to scientists, this swarm isn't anything abnormal and doesn't indicate any impending volcanic eruption activity.

At this time the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory does not consider the swarm to be unusual and the earthquakes are likely related to tectonic fault sources. Also there is no indication of premonitory volcanic or hydrothermal activity, but ongoing analyses will evaluate these different sources. Information on the earthquake can be viewed at the University of Utah Seismograph Stations: http://www.seis.utah.edu/.

Seismograph recordings from stations of the Yellowstone seismograph station can be viewed online at: http://quake.utah.edu/helicorder/yell_webi.htm.

Anyone who has felt earthquakes in the swarm are encouraged to fill out a form on the USGS Community Felt reports web site: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/dyfi/.