The Difference Between Defamation and Opinion

Here's the difference between defamation and opinion:

Defamation: "She's a wrinkly old maid" (I have the skin of a 35 year old)

Opinion: "I think she's got wrinkly old skin" or "she looks to me to have wrinkly old skin" (people are entitled to their opinion stated as such)

This is just one example of unprovoked defaming comments after the deposition was taken posted on USENET by Edmond Wollmann.

Can I lawfully refer to Edmond Wollmann as a loser without it being defaming? This is the blog question today; does Edmond Wollmann fit the description of a loser enabling this label to be lawfully applied?

Generally, a loser is someone who. . .

• drops out of high school having nothing to do with belonging to a military family.
  
  
• is a divorcee from the 80's who had a son he exploits as part of his cover-up criminal activities and harassment of his victim.
  
  
• gets evicted for non-payment of rent.
  
  
• gets taken to small claims court by San Diego State University.
  
  
• gets kicked off of various email services for abusing their terms and conditions.
  
  
• owns a cheap mobile home in the middle of nowhere in New Mexico as his only home ownership late in life.
  
  
• spends much of his time on USENET forum boards where he proudly claims he's resided for 15 years, overlooking he's received various kook awards from his participation.
  
  
• his enemies take great amount of time to document on various websites - example: www.smbtech.com/ed
  
  
• been convicted of public nuisance within the past 7 years.
  
  
• in the 90's called the police on his former petite girlfriend accusing her of battery for slapping him for his obnoxious behavior.
  
  
• writes his own fantastic self published book reviews on Amazon while complaining for their allowing any true opinions of his book.
  
  
• complains to the FBI about his enemies having displaced his web site's top Google position.
  
  
• threatens the life of a woman plaintiff with an Alice Cooper poem he violated copyright on one of his forum posts.
  
  
• has such a hard time with reality he falsely writes he deposed the person who deposed him.
  
  
• attempts to drape himself with labels of integrity and empowerment in vain.
  
  
• lives in denial he has any problem whatsoever; no self-reflection applies.
  
  
• puts up a cowardly anonymous libelous blog about a woman he's been cyber stalking and harassing for two years.
  
  
• over the years various people make long laborious lists about their experiences with.
  

The term "loser" applies here.

• Poster's 100 Reasons Why Edmond Wollmann's an Asshole

Amazing Barbra Streisand Doesn't Practice, Read Music, Perform in Living Rooms

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

I was amazed to learn Barbra Streisand who has one of the greatest singing gifts of her generation, claims she is a totally self-taught singer who never bothered with lessons, scales, and vocal exercises. Moreover, Streisand never bothered to learn how to read music. She speaks in this interview as being so shy, she'd turn her back to people in her earliest performances.

In this interview, Streisand claims prior to her recent performance, she was just "praying" her voice would sound good since she hadn't sung since last year. I was absolutely amazed her singing is based on total faith in her gift to remain miraculously having nothing to do with practicing, rehearsing and doing typical vocal exercises most every singer uses. It appears based on her statements that Streisand believes singing is a gift from God and her faith.

Get Your Metal Vaccination Bracelet and Flu Shot or Go to FEMA Camp

The government has plans in place to vaccinate Americans by force all over the country. Oklahoma has already passed a law everyone must be vaccinated. Imagine the dollar signs in the vaccine manufacturer's eyes!

The logistics are in place that everyone will be provided with a permanent metal bracelet with an RFID chip denoting the vaccination was taken along with other personal information. This is obviously the first step of the ultimate computer chip implant.

Apparently, the FEMA camp and coffins are for the dissenters who will be dying in the camps. They plan on carting off Americans who refuse to take the vaccination to these FEMA compounds we've been hearing about the past couple of years.

The vaccination is considered a soft kill weapon which will be a slow death for many Americans according to several sources. If you really think about it, this is the way to kill off a large part of the population and imprison the rest while making millions of dollars off of poison vaccine production. Sources say the swine flu was manufactured in a laboratory for this purpose.

For those who wonder why the government wants to kill off its population, it's due to the coming orchestrated dollar collapse, lack of manageability of the population as such, and a means to enforce a computer chip implant program by scaring the hell out of everyone.

• California Military Roadblocks for Vaccinations
• Boston Implements Flu Shot Tracking
  

Perjury Games About to End - Male Domination Issues Exposed

A fictitious George Orwell sent me an email this evening reminding me of an upcoming hearing on October 15, 2009. I had requested the hearing to correct an injustice committed against me by a fraud - Cyber #2 who was recently given a three year restraining order on September 23, 2009. Someone flew out from Vancouver Washington to testify they sent something I was accused of sending postmarked from there. I originally believed sworn affidavits were enough but it turned out only an appearance is considered real testimony.

Since I obtained a restraining order against Cyber #2 with much effort of having to have two witnesses, it was rather pathetic the ease of which this fascist walked into his small town court with no evidence in failing to meet the statutory requirements. Without any counsel, Cyber #2 falsely accused me of stalking his ugly girlfriend 18 times. His evidence wasn't any police reports, since he didn't have any, but his perjury testimony. His other alleged evidence was what he scribbled on a piece of paper as follows:

This was the pathetic complaint of a mentally ill person of an alleged "threat" sent. This lazy note caused a slew of legal documents to be filed and of people to testify. The outcome is still pending of the initial filing.

Attorneys make money on this kind of thing and apparently the court is trying to suck innocent people into the system with virtually no evidence. It's a real shame they think nothing of trying to ruin someone's life over a Pacific Heights type of nutjob's false accusations. I live in an entirely different county of this person and knew nothing of his girlfriend.

I recently learned Cyber #2 had the audacity to go file a police report against the process server who he chased out to his car after he was served. This is the server's declaration affidavit.

A process server's declaration statement will be held with greater credence then Cyber #2's recent fraudulent criminal complaint accusing him of vehicular assault.

An attorney's letter was drafted on June 22, 2009 addressed to
Cyber #2's former name. When we learned there had been a name change it delayed
the letter's delivery weeks.

This is an evil game men play. It's interesting the extreme extent they go to cover-up their being rejected by a woman to make her look crazy and like a Glen Close Fatal Attraction character. This man had no evidence of my ever contacting him because I hadn't. An attorney from Parker Stanbury LLP had even drafted a cease and desist letter. Unlike Cyber #2, who committed perjury and covered up his cyber stalking activities as such, I was following the law all the way.

Now I have some nutjob George Orwell sending me more emails. The fact is, I am innocent of this vicious man's false accusations. He is a mentally ill Pacific Heights character role who two witnesses, including a former friend, can attest to as such.

So this is the perjury game this vicious individual Cyber #2 plays. Perjury is common in the courts. You have to present hard evidence, like depositions and IP addresses, etc., to prove your case over perjury these days.

Cyber #2 believes he can do anyone wrong he so pleases that he's above the law and he can lie and get away with it. . . ..for now.

Examples of Obama Refusing to Salute the American Flag, Wear Pin

Interesting Videos Comparing Obama to Hitler

Imagine being a kid being forced to sing this garbage in praise of the President in your local public school. It's pretty shocking stuff.

• New World Economic Order Takes Place at G20 - Reuters

Cyber #2 Gets Restraining Order - Witness Flies from Vancouver Washington

For anyone who thinks because they use an anonymous proxy server service they can get away with sending threatening, rude and annoying emails and comments to blogs, think again! I was able to get a three year restraining order against Cyber #2 yesterday in Concord Superior Court. An outstanding judge listened attentively to two witnesses, a former friend and victim of Cyber #2, and the second a victim who flew all the way out from Vancouver Washington to testify.

The hearing began with information my attorney couldn't make the hearing having been held up at a trial so I had to represent myself. An associate attorney was sent who was very helpful but he couldn't represent me there since he didn't really have all the information. I had to present the case and evidence to the judge myself.

In addition to having two strong witnesses who explained their experiences with being victims of Cyber #2, I had also conducted a deposition prior to the hearing which proved helpful. Cyber 2 is the guy who chased the process server to his car I wrote about in a former post. My attorney gave me good advice it was worth the extra $400 to get the transcript rushed for the court date. The deposition made a huge difference as I was able to provide evidence of Cyber #2 admitting to certain key things, and evading certain questions with "no comment" that clearly pointed to his guilt of authoring Blog #2 of me.

The blog cheryllicksass.blogspot.com was authored by Cyber #2. Its full of malicious libel and misinformation. The vicious man who wrote that blog now has a restraining order. His latest emails and other malicious activities threatening my now abandoned business were reviewed by a Judge who agreed there was cause for a restraining order. This RO includes emails and any kind of means of electronic harassment.

Note to Cyber #1: Any anonymous and ficitious name harassment I get from the USENET board due to your writing about me and my case there, can be construed as your harassment. Take note of it and leave me the hell alone.

High School Drop Out Brings Son Nathan Wollmann to Deposition

I just discovered Edmond Wollmann is writing materials on the USENET forum about my deposing him on September 15, 2009 showing how insecure he is. If his lawyer views this article, he should instruct his client to stop writing about his case on forums because I'm continually getting harassing emails about it forcing me to respond in this manner.

First, a little about Wollmann's appearance at the deposition. Edmond Wollmann is bald, overweight and pasty pale white, all very uncommon for those who live in the great weather and sunshine of San Diego. People who live in San Diego are generally there because they enjoy the weather tending to spend time outdoors jogging and enjoying the sunshine. Edmond Wollmann looks like something out of the Munsters television program. He struck me as fitting the characterization of an underground mole.

Mr. Wollmann insinuated someone has impersonated him on-line and he did not own the email address "ewollmann@aol.com" on May 23, 2007. The long string of evidence points to otherwise. He also claims he's never posted anything on USENET other than under his own professional signature. I'm currently working with an attorney to have a subpoena accepted in Virginia's court where AOL is located, in order to obtain the account information.

I can't imagine any man who would exploit his own son by asking him to be the videographer for a deposition in which he admitted to:

• Having criminal convictions for trespassing & public nuisance
• Having never graduated high school
• Lying repeatedly in covering up his crazy behavior cyber stalking, harassing and abusing a woman on-line.

Any man who would invite his son, Nathan Wollmann, to videograph his deposition in which he repeatedly lied and had to admit to criminal behavior can be construed as indecent and immoral. The shame of involving one's son in covering up for one's self and involving him in videoing the plaintiff during questioning doesn't register with such a pathological individual.

So for the record, Edmond Wollmann, 55 was a high school drop out. Back in those days of his generation, being a high school drop out was an indication of some serious problems of an individual. It was the real stamp of a loser unless the individual had a military family. Being a high school dropout is where Edmond Wollmann's great insecurity with himself apparently began in which he feels it necessary to lie about and smear people on-line.

The Huge Divide Between Myself and Edmond Wollmann

There's a huge difference between myself and Edmond Wollmann that he's too delusional and pathological to recognize. Compared to Edmond Wollmann I received the following awards from one of the top high schools in the country I graduated from in Palos Verdes Estates, in 1974-78:

• Outstanding Freshman - PVHS Orchestra '75
• U.S.C. Music Camp Scholarship - PVHS Orchestra '76
• Outstanding Stylist - PVHS Jazz Choir '78

When I was in grade school I was playing viola with some of today's top musicians in youth orchestras in Hollywood, CA and later as a teenager at music camps.

I'm continually receiving harassing anonymous emails about Wollmann's posts on USENET and all kinds of crazy stuff.

Edmond Wollmann Embarrasses His Son at Deposition Admitting Public Nuisance Conviction

It would be difficult having any father who lacks common sense not to know when enough is enough. It takes a lot of stupidity in this day and age for a non-homeless well fed clothed educated person to get a public nuisance conviction in San Diego California. Such a person who received a public nuisance conviction was Edmond Wollmann in 2003. Wollmann actually had two counts against him as one was dropped.

A normal son of such a person might think the following to himself watching his father have to answer questions he was also asked to video tape at a deposition for him:

"Yup, that's my dad alright, the criminally convicted public nuisance. He's been convicted of trespassing and obsessively writes crazy things on USENET that's gotten him various kook awards. He calls Pluto a planet and the constellation Orion a star in his historical (i.e., hysterical) writings. He writes his own shining Amazon reviews for his self-published book. He'll even file a Google copyright violation for posting his email as if you've copied a literary giant's writing material. Yes, my father is quite desperate to save face and impress me." - Family Video Series #1

It's no wonder Edmond Wollmann is very sensitive to what his son, Nathan Wollmann, thinks of him that he feels a need to obsessively personally attack and lie about others on the Internet for his honor. "My son's my best friend" Wollmann writes. "He video taped the Merrill deposition." No, Mr. Wollmann, it wasn't the Merrill deposition, it was the Wollmann deposition. You were the one deposed, not me. Your recent publicly stated written opinions of me during the deposition have absolutely zero relevance in the matter other than adding to my discovery.

Wollmann's personal insecurities with saving face with his son have been unlawfully transferred onto me in this matter. He needs to stop sending me anonymous accusatory emails and posting his libelous garbage on USENET trying to beat up on a woman on-line.

Here's a glimpse of a typical email I get from a perverted sick man:

I get several dozen anonymous rude emails like the one above each month many of which I believe are generated by Edmond Wollmann.

Google Didn't Force Me - I Volunteered

I recently received a typical accusatory email and wanted to respond I voluntarily removed links to Edmond Wollmann's conviction cases on this blog. I don't want his crimes searchable on Google linked with my songchannels.com music site.

The PDF files were stored on songchannels and Docutur.com. Docutur kept getting hacked into as the other place I stored them. I decided to simply no longer list the cases, especially since I have Mr. Wollmann's statement under oath now admitting he was convicted of trespassing and public nuisance. His concealed firearm charge was apparently dismissed.

I was performing analytical tests on my site's searchability and discovered people who weren't searching for music were coming to my site. Google picks up PDF text in its search engine and I don't want songchannels.com's searches to produce results for such key words as "San Diego Superior Court" and other similar related searches that have nothing to do with music. So, I took down the cases from songchannels voluntarily along with several others.

As far as Wollmann's Google copyright DMCA complaint about my posting a copy of this email in a blog article, I'm challenging it as erroneous and waiting for Google to give me the okay to repost it.