President on Steroids: Obama Wants Superman Powers With Proposed 'Super Congress'

If one uses the analogy of someone being in impossible debt and how there are usually two options, trying to get more credit to pay off the debt or bankruptcy, that was the predicament the U.S. government was in yesterday.  Most anyone in this predicament would be forced into bankruptcy, but not the U.S. government.

Knowing the end was near to its insane spending spree, including five fraudulent wars and hundreds of military bases worldwide, the U.S. government has chosen not only to give itself a new credit card with $1.4 trillion more to spend of tax payer money, but has made sure the same scenario will never happen again.  In an insane power grab that's scaring the hell out of many Americans, the corrupt have decided to override the U.S. Constitution altogether by appointing a new Super Congress making President Obama a virtual Superman thus giving the house and senate approximately 90% less power.

"In a statement made yesterday in response to the passage of the Budget Control Act, Congressman Ron Paul expressed his alarm at the establishment of this 'disturbing' new committee, and warned that it would be used to ram through tax increases.

The Congressman added that the committee represents 'Nothing more than a way to disenfranchise the majority of Congress by denying them the chance for meaningful participation in the crucial areas of entitlement and tax reform. It cedes power to draft legislation to a special commission, hand-picked by the House and Senate leadership.'” Ron Paul Sounds Alarm on Disturbing Super Congress - PrisonPlanet.com

The debt ceiling deal appears to many to be a coup to make the government exponentially more powerful through centralizing the decision making authority into the hands of a few.  What will this new Super Congress (SC) mean for America?  Here are what a few have to say who have posted videos.  Alex Jones, for one, is angry and terrified of what is transpiring.

Alex Jones does a late night video about emerging dictatorship powers.

Like most Americans, I've always thought of Lyndon LaRouche as a scary extremist politician thanks to the cult like behavior and propaganda his followers exhibit in front of U.S. Postal Offices.  I've seen these propaganda tables numerous times in Southern and Northern California since the 1980's and have always been disturbed by them primarily because the followers are extremely aggressive and annoying.  Because of LaRouche's presentation of himself to the public, I never paid much attention until he began appearing recently on the Alex Jones Radio show.  I've since listened to LaRouche for the first time from these interviews and now observe he's quite different than what I initially believed him to be.  In any event, I thought I'd post LaRouche's video over what's occurring in government that he considers a coup by Obama for Hitleresque authority.

Lyndon LaRouche chilling statements on the Alex Jones Radio program yesterday.

Is Lyndon LaRouche just some lunatic having his followers put out a cryptic video?  The presentation here is typical LaRouche style of cult like followers out of the mainstream.  Regardless of the messenger, the facts are there for those to observe. 

Also see LaRouche's Emergency Leaflet Flyer Stop Obama's Hitler Coup.

The wisdom of don't shoot the messenger has always been paramount throughout history. I'm open to hearing from anyone who sounds a warning over what's currently happening in the U.S. government.  One simply can't blame the messenger over what's happening to America no matter who it is.  

This is what men do when they're on the verge of failure and disaster, they run to their delusions rather than face the facts they need to change their ways.  Like Charlie Sheen, Obama says "winning". 

Activist Rosalind Peterson Warns of Unauthorized U.S. Electric Grid Experiment

 

Yesterday I received a red alert email from activist Rosalind Peterson of the Agriculture Defense Coalition and California Sky Watch I've decided to post on my blog.  It seems a private corporation has taken it upon itself to experiment with America's electric grid that could have severe consequences for the public. There's been no public hearing or debate and government officials appear to know nothing about it.  

Here's a brief summary of the problem as reported by CBS news June 27, 2011:

"A yearlong experiment with America's electric grid could mess up traffic lights, security systems and some computers - and make plug-in clocks and appliances like programmable coffeemakers run up to 20 minutes fast.' 

A lot of people are going to have things break and they're not going to know why,' said Demetrios Matsakis, head of the time service department at the U.S. Naval Observatory, one of two official timekeeping agencies in the federal government." CBS News June 27, 2011

Repost begins:

COSTLY U.S. POWER GRID TESTS APPROVED WITHOUT PUBLIC CONSENT

COSTS & CONSEQUENCES

By Rosalind Peterson

July 31, 2011

On June 27, 2011, CBS News reported: “…A yearlong experiment with America's electric grid could mess up traffic lights, security systems and some computers and make plug-in clocks and appliances like programmable coffeemakers run up to 20 minutes fast...”   CBS News also reported that:  “…Tom O'Brian, who heads the time and frequency division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, expects widespread (unspecified) effects..." CBS News June 27, 2011

The CBS report did not specify who approved this test.  This test will begin without public consent, substantial public notice or public debate in mid-July 2011.  This test could disrupt so many businesses, state and local governments, and other government agencies, that it could quickly become a National Security nightmare and a massive public headache.

"A lot of people are going to have things break and they're not going to know why," said Demetrios Matsakis, head of the time service department at the U.S. Naval Observatory, one of two official timekeeping agencies in the federal government…This will be an interesting experiment to see how dependent our timekeeping is on the power grid, Matsakis said.  CBS News June 27, 2011

"The United States Naval Observatory (USNO) provides a wide range of astronomical data and products, and serves as the official source of time for the U.S. Department of Defense and a standard of time for the entire United States."  Precise Time-U.S. Naval Observatory 

According to CBS News, “…The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), runs the nation's interlocking web of transmission lines and power plants and they will be conducting the tests…”  Will this company be liable for appliance replacement and other costs associated with these tests? 

The disruptions from these tests may have the following consequences according to various news reports:

1)         CBS News Reports:  “…The group that oversees the U.S. power grid (NERC), is proposing an experiment that would allow more frequency variation than it does now without (time) corrections, according to a company presentation obtained by The Associated Press... "Is anyone using the grid to keep track of time?...McClelland said. "Let's see if anyone complains if we eliminate it.” …No one is sure what will be affected…” [1]  This appears to be an experiment to permanently eliminate time corrections. 

2)         CBS News:  “…A June 14 company presentation spelled out the potential effects of the change:  East Coast clocks may run as much as 20 minutes fast over a year, but West Coast clocks are only likely to be off by 8 minutes. In Texas, it's only an expected speedup of 2 minutes. Some parts of the grid, like in the East, tend to run faster than others. Errors add up. If the grid averages just over 60 cycles a second, clocks that rely on the grid will gain 14 seconds per day, according to the company's presentation…”  This could mean that your clocks and other appliances plugged into the electricity grid, will no longer be accurate while the tests are being conducted for at least one year.

3)         Time Disruptions - How will people who don't have Internet or Cell Phone access be able to get the correct time since telephone companies don't offer this service anymore?  This company presumes to believe that everyone has access to the Internet and will have instant correct time…this is not the case.

4)         Appliances, cooking timers, SMART Meters, clocks, and other items that are time sensitive could be disrupted or completely fail.

5)         The article does not address problems that may occur in hospitals, during surgeries, when using time sensitive equipment.  This type of equipment may be highly sensitive to time variations.  Other industries and businesses may also have problems and may have to make many costly adjustments.  Who will pay these costs?

6)         CBS News:  “…Spokeswoman Kimberly Mielcarek said the company is still discussing the test and gauging reactions to its proposal, and may delay the experiment a bit…”  This company has no idea what problems these tests will have on the public and our electric grid.  It is just an experiment and they are taking no financial responsibility for the consequences if these tests have negative, unknown consequences. 

7)         These tests are to last one year.  This seems like a long time to conduct these tests.     And this should be heavily reviewed and studied in advance of any testing.

8)         If the federal government provides the time, via telephone, the location and number were not noted in the CBS article.

The public should not have to rely on leaving our computers and cell phones, using extra electricity, just to make sure that we have the correct time.  And we have no idea if our computers and other gadgets will work while these tests are being conducted.

If our appliances and other equipment break because of these grid experiments who is going to pay our costs?    If these tests cost local, city, and county governments money to respond to problems associated with these tests, who pay the costs of fixing or repairing them? 

There needs to be congressional hearings and a public debate before these tests are approved.  To be at the mercy of a private company, that has decided on a “whim”, and without any idea of the problems and consequences that their power grid tests will cause, is unthinkable at this time. 

Stop the Tests, Let the Public Debate Begin, and Contact your Elected Officials and let them know that you expect that they will take action to protect the public interest.  We need a comprehensive investigation prior to any experiments being initiated.  

• Rosalind Peterson's Story Archives

Lighten Up Sundays - Talking Dog Mishka Videos

Today's Light Up Sundays features cute talented dog talking videos that can't be missed.  Mishka's a husky that mimics human speech and even has her own YouTube Channel. 

Such a sweet dog.

This husky dog argument has been successfully translated to English captions.

They ask Mishka a question.

Mishka makes a song that's even on iTunes!

B-day bash for Mishka. 

Default Countdown: America Could Lose Its Sovereignty

Even if America defaults August 2nd, it will be a couple months before it doesn't pay its bills so there's no need to panic yet.  The sad part of all this is none of it had to happen, Americans gave over control of their economy to traitor politicians who sold out their country to International global interests.

This default has been planned for years by globalists who President Obama is clearly in concert with.  It's been said Obama sold out America's sovereignty already at the G-20 back in 2009.

"Moving as quickly as he can to gut the USA and then divide its body parts amongst like-minded globalists, the USA’s Supreme Leader used the G-20 conference to begin his turnover of USA sovereignty to said internationalists and start the move toward a one-world government. Obama has signed off on international legislation -- the Financial Stability Board -- that would regulate ALL firms, including those within the USA and places them under the responsibility of an international governmental agency." - Link

I found an outstanding video explaining what's likely going to happen and what the problems have been as explained by Max Keiser of the Keiser Report:

This is an outstanding video explaining what's likely to happen and why, that America will lose its sovereignty if drastic measures aren't taken.

I could never understand why so many of my fellow Americans have been so dense to vote their enemies into office while treating them as celebrities.  Surely Americans will be paying a heavy price for remaining ignorant for so long by living in such denial. Denial is a huge problem in the U.S., where people choose to simply bury their heads in the sand rather then deal with reality. The number one vehicle for such denial has been the American addiction to television programming. 

Americans should be preparing for what's transpiring by storing up on food, water and emergency supplies.  Prices are expected to triple in the future for fuel and food.

• Apple Now Has More Cash Then The U.S. Government - The Sun

A Pathetic Crack Whore U.S. Government Begs Public For Handouts

After the corrupt con artist politicians in Washington D.C. trashed the United States of America, they're exhibiting pathological insanity and desparation begging the public to donate to help reduce the deficit.  These sick criminals in the U.S. Government have the audacity after they've pillaged the country to ask Americans for a handout! Forget about asking them to end their fraudulent wars invading other countries for resources, forget about asking them to do common sense things.

The U.S government has put up a page provided by the Department of The Treasury to accept donations to pay down the public debt.

The federal government has put a form online to accept donations from the public which reads:

Note the wording the United States Treasury is asking for handouts from the American public to "reduce the public debt."  It's not the government's debt, it's our debt!  This is just another way of saying it's the public's problem, that we're a burden to the government that they need our donations and support!
 

So let me get this straight.

They stole our money to give the wall street bankers $16 trillion in secret bailouts and $9 Trillion has disappeared from the Fed.

When it was time to bail out the taxpayer they let wall street run mortgage foreclosure mills all over the country and instead of prosecuting the fraud they have allowed it to continue for years. Instead they have made it official policy not to prosecute fraud.

In fact states are negotiating deals to give the crooks immunity.

They have spent trillions of dollars on illegal overseas wars for oil and drugs.

They hand over hundreds of billions to spy on us creating a domestic spy program that has grown beyond our worst nightmares.

They have stolen trillions from Social Security and are conducting secret talks to chop Social Security, Medicare and Public Education.

They have repeatedly violated our civil rights, censor  us , beat us, torture us, kidnap us,  call us terrorists, target us for assassination,  and detain us indefinitely with no charge in overseas torture camps. - Give Us Your Money, Suckers - Alexander Higgins Blog

This is obviously a desperate dangerous government.  They want all  of our money,  and if we don't volunteer to give it up to them they will simply steal it all in the form of pensions, 401K's and social security.

The government is behaving like a crack whore with money as its addiction, quickly evolving into a very dangerous and insidious entity all should be wary of.

Court Breakdown: Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Chokes Fellow Female Justice

I don't understand why it's at all necessary to conduct an investigation since a woman of such great authority, Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, accused her fellow justice David T. Prosser, Jr. of placing her in a chokehold last month. The incident occurred behind closed doors in which Justice Prosser was reported to have grabbed Justice Bradley by the neck with both hands during an argument in her chambers prior to the court's decision to uphold a bill. 

"Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that Justice David Prosser put her in a chokehold during the dispute. She contacted the newspaper late Saturday after Prosser denied rumors about the altercation.

'The facts are that I was demanding that he get out of my office and he put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold,' Bradley told the newspaper.'"-Article Link

It seems Justice Prosser is hoping his denials can somehow overcome these accusations from a fellow justice and that his buddies will exonerate him from an alleged lying  wicked witch liberal justice.  The forthcoming investigation being conducted by his fellow male counterparts is clearly designed to exonerate him.  As I've revealed throughout this blog, men in the legal system cover-up for one another, especially when it comes to accusations from women.

Justice David Prosser, Jr. knows an investigation conducted by other male colleagues will cover-up on his behalf.  This is the way the corrupt court system works folks. This isn't the first time Prosser's had complaints.

In this clip Justice Prosser attempts to grab a newscaster's microphone.

No tax payer paid cover-up investigation is necessary  The man's obviously guilty since Supreme Court justices don't run around falsely accusing each other of assault.  If the two were married and in a domestic dispute that would be one thing, this is quite another.  This is a good example of how men think they're above the law and accusations simply don't stick to them.

"Bradley sent all the justices an email after that meeting, saying Prosser's behavior was unacceptable. She said later that she considered making a report to law enforcement but decided against it." Article Link

I again ask, why is there a need for an investigation?  Obviously the man is guilty.  What greater weight of credibility must one have then that of a Supreme Court Justice?  

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David T. Prosser, Jr. is clearly guilty of assaulting a fellow justice.   It's as simple as that.  Prosser can't admit his guilt because he believes himself to be above the law.  No investigation using taxpayer funds is needed, not when a justice on that level makes such a claim.  Period!

Why Bankers Are Creeping Me Out

Last week I performed a refinance loan signing for someone who I later learned was a director of securities at Wells Fargo bank.  The couple was already pissed off at the loan facilitating bank prior to my arrival, something I'm familiar with in people sometimes wanting to vent and take out on me.  For instance, my last birthday evening was spent with a couple furious at Bank of America so much so that I thought they were going to rip my head off when I  arrived.  So just imagine a sight to behold of a bank executive upset over another bank's refinance loan practices? I was a sitting duck for potential abuse for sure.

The director from Wells Fargo was so upset with the bank that he refused to sign his middle initial in his name as was delineated in the signature block on the deed of trust.  He said he never signs his name with his middle initial and he just wouldn't do it.  I told the banker if he didn't sign his name exactly as listed in the signature block, the loan papers would have to be redrafted without the initial requirement.  He responded that he didn't care if the papers had to be redrafted and continued to sign all of the documents quite angrily.

When I was called back to perform the banker's signing a second time I was later informed he wanted to get his own notary public to do his paperwork.  Fearing I wouldn't be paid for my work and time, I contacted this bank executive who expressed regret I had informed the bank he refused to sign his name correctly.  Imagine that, a banker blaming me for doing my job!  That is my job and this banker behaved as though I had somehow tattled on him that caused his loan to be redone.  Often times in instances where loan documents have to be redrafted the loan signing agent (me) doesn't get paid unless they go back and redo the signing. This director at Wells Fargo was trying to make it look like I was responsible for the problem, that it was my fault somehow in his getting another notary to do the resigning.  A typical banker!

Let there be no doubt that bankers all over the country are a pain in the rear:

"As all of you are aware, I have many cases and field calls from all over the country where banks break into homes, change the locks, sometimes take property.

The banks fight aggressively, very aggressively and take the position that they have every legal right to invade the homes of Americans.  The banks take the position that when you take out a mortgage, you have given up your right to be protected by the law from unreasonable searches and seizures of your property.

Think about that Americans, and send this along to all your friends.  The banks have taken the position that they do not need court order or supervision of law enforcement when they decide to break into your home." - The Banks As Burglars, Why Are They Not Punished?  Why Are They Above The Law? - Matt Weidner Law Blog

Here's another example in the words of a lawyer in Florida:

"Lawyers that defend homeowners are being persecuted and crushed. Activists and homeowners who plead with  leaders for reasonable solutions are being crushed.  And our courts, buried under the wave of a crisis created by the banks are overwhelmed.  And the problems are only going to get much, much worse." - Take Back The Land Coming to the United States - Matt Weidner Blog

It's interesting to note when I asked the Wells Fargo director if he was in the financial industry, he responded with "no".  Bankers are good at lying!  Why would he lie?  Every time I deal with bankers at my local bank, they are so nosy and prying into my personal life, I just say as little as possible.  They always try very hard to make me believe they're truly interested and my friend.  Once in a while I come across a genuinely nice person working at a bank, but much of the time I keep my distance.  Sometimes when they ask probing personal questions I feel like responding with "it's none of your business!"

Whenever I do loan signings on behalf of Wells Fargo bank they ask if I can invoice them and it usually takes two months to get paid!   All I can say is these banks have some real nerve and audacity these days.  The worst of all of them is Bank of America, a bank that can burn in hell.  BofA's loan refinance documents are always a mess to deal with and their customers most always complain to me about this bank's incompetence.  A couple of lawyers I did a signing for once laughed at BofA's term for an additional fee as "padding" they found so hilarious they wanted to frame and hang the document on the wall.

A few nights ago I had a three hour loan signing to midnight with an auditor in the financial industry who works for VISA.  Though she was very nice, she scrutinized everything, and the banker who was in a conference call with us appeared to sound drunk being unable to answer her questions.  The banker was calling the borrower "sweetheart" and "darling" to the shock of the borrower who asked if she was on candid camera.

Most of my loan signing experiences with clients are very positive.   However there's always that 5% who want to take out their issues with their bank on me.

Americans Need To Prepare For Coming Financial Armageddon Now!

There are several different possibilities of what will occur should the U.S. default on its debt Americans need to be preparing for now.  Most people have no idea what to do since such an epic event has never happened before in their lifetimes.  This isn't the kind of problem one can live in denial over by putting on their headphones listening to a favorite song or watching a movie.  First and foremost, this is the time people should be stocking up on canned goods, food, water, toiletries and anything else they can think of, including for their pets welfare. Everyone should know that there will likely be rioting and much chaos everywhere.

"We are witnessing, in accelerated time, the total financial implosion of an empire. We're watching it burn right before our very eyes, and it was all set in motion in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve, of course.

This day is coming. We've been warning about it here on NaturalNews since at least 2008, when I held a phone seminar and warned people to buy gold and silver. (At that time, gold was in the $600 range. Today it's $1,600...) Actually, I'm on the record warning people about the dot-com bubble before it popped, and about the housing bubble before it popped, too. Now I'm warning about the coming collapse of the dollar, which now even mainstream people are beginning to see as a possibility. Even Obama himself said we need to increase the debt ceiling to avoid what he called, Financial Armageddon." - . . America's Currency Headed For Total Collapse - Natural News

Americans have been living in denial for quite some time that their country's been taken over by a band of brutal criminals.  When the shit hits the fan, many Americans' eyes will be forced wide opened that the U.S. is no longer theirs having been hijacked from them.  There will be no more time to watch television's lying talking heads, a movie, or sports event. Things are definitely going to get insane if there's a U.S. default. What it means is the U.S. dollar will become worthless and eventually likely replaced with a world currency. 

The wealthy in the U.S. will become poor overnight unless they were smart enough to exchange their money overseas and invest in precious metals. In fact, many of the wealthy are probably headed overseas right now to avoid the calamity.  If you can, now is the time to leave the United States that's sinking like the Titanic.

The first thing to remember is when society breaks down, there will likely be no typical police services.  The U.N. military forces might well be brought in to deal with the chaos.  For those unaware, U.N. forces have been trained to raid Americans' homes, ship them off to FEMA camps and/or kill them.  Those are just some of the potential horrors that await up ahead for many. 

People should be considering how to protect themselves from possible looters should government systems break down.   People should buy plenty of guns, ammo, pepper spray, stun guns, and defensive weapons they're able. While their at it, people should upgrade the security on their homes since looters will try to enter if they're not home.

If I were employed at a corporation having no real access to my 401K I would quit my job to gain access to the funds in order to quickly convert the dollars to tangible assets.  People who continue to work at their jobs are sitting ducks for devastation.  The dollar is headed for serious devaluing and inflation is going make everything very expensive. This could quite possibly be the final week of American's lives prior to chaos breaking lose in which America will never be the same again.  This could be it, the final days of normalcy Americans will have ever known in their lives prior to when the shit hits the fan and all hell breaks lose.  People should prepare for the worst now before it's too late.

Reasons I Chose To Be a Vexatious Litigant - I Just Couldn't Take It Anymore

I'm proud of litigant in pro se William Windsor who has defeated the corrupt U.S. Federal court system by saturating them with valid motions in his case against judicial tyranny.  In an article posted today Janet Phelan, an investigative reporter who specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption, states "how use of the vexatious litigant determination has been applied quite liberally of late".   Phelan provided an example of Casey and Marilyn Peters  who were deemed vexatious on the weight of filing only one lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court.

". . . a decision which impacted their ability to recoup monies allegedly stolen from them through decisions by Judge Aviva K. Bobb in probate court. They have also alleged misconduct by Bobb as pivotal in causing the death of Casey's mother, Lee Peters, who was a conservatee. The law explicitly does not allow an individual to be termed "vexatious" for filing one suit." - Access Denied: Judicial Reform Activist William Windsor Deemed Vexatious Litigant - ActivistsPost.com

What this means of course is if one stands up for their rights in a court of law, the court can claim vexatious litigant based on one case such as if it denotes challenging the judicial system in any way. That's how lawless those in the judicial system have become to cover up for their rigged judicial system.

I admit, a while back I went on a sneezing fit with a few lawsuits I filed.  The first one I filed in 2008 was meant to be a joke and means of rhetorical rants after the late 1990's of my being litigated against with two crazy restraining orders in which lawyers generated a lot of fees for themselves.  In my lawsuit against the law firm of Baker & McKenzie LLP, a billion dollar a year global law firm, I had a wonderful time mocking the legal culture that had been allowing perjury, great exaggerations and all kinds of nonsense in restraining orders filed against me years prior.  For anyone who'd like to view my loads of laughs litigation here are a few I filed:

1.  Response to Defendant's Demurrer

2.  Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint


In the late 1990's attorneys had taken my minor disputes at a corporation where I had left a paper trail,  as well as that of roommate conflict opportunities I recently posted about and blew them up as a cover for their client's actions and behavior.  Years later I set the tone of what was to follow of my own litigation activity after getting to know the legal system from within working 10 years at such law firms as Kirkland & Ellis LLP (2 years), Pillsbury Winthrop LLP (3.5 years), Preston, Gates & Ellis LLP (1 year) and Morrison & Foerster LLP (1 year).  If I was such the kind of person these restraining orders claimed, how could I possibly last at such a strict anal law firm as Kirkland & Ellis or Pillsbury?

How I Evolved Into a Vexatious Litigant

After graduating from such an experience working for attorneys as a legal word processor, I then got a paralegal certificate that enabled me loads of fun filing a frivolous lawsuit against Baker & McKenzie LLP.  Yes, I knew my claim was frivolous, but I wanted to document what I experienced being burned multiple times by one of their lesbian employees in HR who was clearly enjoying devastating me with backstabbing games.  I didn't have a lawful case just an ethical one that genuinely caused me emotional distress since I was promised a job there. I suffered months with pay below my usual salary and they kept deliberately devastating me in the most humiliating ways possible.  Yes, I knew all along my lawsuit wouldn't fly but venting in the lawsuit was well worth it to me.  I had loads of fun, it was a blast suing the law firm in pro se.  My favorite part was when I wrote my concerns Baker & McKenzie as a global law firm was superseding the U.S. court system since it was quite obvious the judge wasn't bothering to read my responding briefs.

I've dealt with what I consider to be Nazi based female management oppressing me at law firms over petty ridiculous matters they intentionally provoked for years.  I was thus many times laughing rolling on the floor having loads of fun litigating over silly matters and experiences at a big name law firm.  I also submitted interrogatories wanting phone records of conversation of the HR person over her preferred employee  who she allowed to steal a job from me.

I'm sure lawyers equally laughed over the tremendous farce they created in the late 90's to cover up their clients' conduct where I had left paper trails.  Without my paper trails they had no case whatsoever against me for anything.   In any event, last year I was declared a vexatious litigant primarily due to my litigation debut of my Baker & McKenzie LLP lawsuit, something well worth it to me.   I didn't have to but later paid Baker & McKenzie their $370 filing fee and was done with it.

I never at any moment took my lawsuit against Baker & McKenzie seriously, it was nothing but a joke on them and my official departure working 10 long grueling years at law firms.  Yes, I deserve the vexatious litigant label based on the B&M lawsuit.  I'm sorry for those litigants who don't deserve the label, such as Mr. Windsor, but the courts are so corrupt these days it's best not to file any lawsuit unless you want to make a mockery of the legal system in doing so.

A Losing Battle With A Rigged & Highly Political Court System

These people in the legal system must win at all costs.  You either mock them in litigation in pro se, or lose your serious lawsuit they will mock one way or another.  As for my lawsuits against cyber stalkers, I filed those quite seriously.  I wish I wouldn't have, but I felt I had to.  I won a default judgment and the other one was dismissed.


I'm sorry Mr. Windsor received his vexatious litigant determination as well as the others in this post.  I clearly deserved mine based on my initial lawsuit. I didn't bother to attend the hearing an attorney attended to address my litigation against he and his client.  Judge's do whatever they want these days and the court system is clearly rigged in favor of its players.  When it gets so bad, for some it comes down to simply a matter of mocking the system for what it is, a rigged lawyer's and judges game.

Unfortunately, my B&M case affected the outcome of one of my cases against a cyber stalker.  I have no idea if what I encountered working at B&M was influenced by materials the cyber stalker had posted about me which contributed to their playing games.  In any event, my head was being played with by various individuals that I felt it was intentional and destructive towards me.  I just felt I had to do something to counter it all.

Cop Kicked Out of Coffee House By Free Thinking American Business Owner

In an earlier post I suggested a good way for a community to deal with their local police officers' offensive actions, such as when they go about arresting people over an event to feed their community's poor, is to deny them service at restaurants and businesses they frequent.  Under many jurisdictions, business owners may lawfully refuse service to anyone for any lawful reason.   

The videos below provide a good example of how a free thinking American local coffee cafe business owner in Portland Oregon bravely denied services to a police officer.  When police activities become damaging to a community there's a means to respond as such by organizing outraged local business owners to make it clear the corruption will not be tolerated.

The videos below demonstrate how people can organize fearlessly to deal with police corruption in their communities. 

One can observe the rejected Police Officer Jim Crooker enjoying displaying his charm to the media and the support of a local sympathizing woman who blogged over feeling sorry for him. It's these kind of blind women, Cornelia Seigneur, who allow themselves to be easily conned by police officers they sometimes allow into their bedrooms.  Yes I do wonder if the officer got into this lady's bedroom.

A small uproar over the incident ensued in which the officer, through his conduit female witness, complained to the media over being discriminated against for the color of his uniform.  The uproar caused the Red and Black Cafe coffee house owner Jim Langely to later call a press conference with the media about why the officer was refused services being asked to leave.

A local business owner Jim Langley explains at a media press conference why he asked the police officer to leave his Portland Oregon coffee house.

I don't know if the laws allow denial of service in certain jurisdictions across the country. If anyone's considering denying police entry to their business or for goods and services, they will need to check their local laws.  My guess is if the police are largely denied local community business services on a wide scale, there will eventually be legislation to prevent this kind of thing. 

Let there be no doubt, in spite of the friendly mask the police officer wore to the camera, the coffee business owner has evoked dark forces having risked his life to stand up to police corruption.  Depending on the degree of corruption in the community, Langley may be found dead one day by some mysterious accident in which police will block investigation much like the one I posted about earlier of Sunny Sheu's murder and the subsequent cover-up for his standing up to a corrupt judge. 

When people stand up to cop corruption, they're literally putting their lives on the line dealing with a group of Mafia like criminal gang of crooks. Mr. Langley's a brave and honorable man, I wish there were more people like him willing to stand up to police corruption in this manner. 

Officer Crooked!  Officer Crook!