Court Breakdown: Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Chokes Fellow Female Justice

I don't understand why it's at all necessary to conduct an investigation since a woman of such great authority, Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, accused her fellow justice David T. Prosser, Jr. of placing her in a chokehold last month. The incident occurred behind closed doors in which Justice Prosser was reported to have grabbed Justice Bradley by the neck with both hands during an argument in her chambers prior to the court's decision to uphold a bill. 

"Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that Justice David Prosser put her in a chokehold during the dispute. She contacted the newspaper late Saturday after Prosser denied rumors about the altercation.

'The facts are that I was demanding that he get out of my office and he put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold,' Bradley told the newspaper.'"-Article Link

It seems Justice Prosser is hoping his denials can somehow overcome these accusations from a fellow justice and that his buddies will exonerate him from an alleged lying  wicked witch liberal justice.  The forthcoming investigation being conducted by his fellow male counterparts is clearly designed to exonerate him.  As I've revealed throughout this blog, men in the legal system cover-up for one another, especially when it comes to accusations from women.

Justice David Prosser, Jr. knows an investigation conducted by other male colleagues will cover-up on his behalf.  This is the way the corrupt court system works folks. This isn't the first time Prosser's had complaints.

In this clip Justice Prosser attempts to grab a newscaster's microphone.

No tax payer paid cover-up investigation is necessary  The man's obviously guilty since Supreme Court justices don't run around falsely accusing each other of assault.  If the two were married and in a domestic dispute that would be one thing, this is quite another.  This is a good example of how men think they're above the law and accusations simply don't stick to them.

"Bradley sent all the justices an email after that meeting, saying Prosser's behavior was unacceptable. She said later that she considered making a report to law enforcement but decided against it." Article Link

I again ask, why is there a need for an investigation?  Obviously the man is guilty.  What greater weight of credibility must one have then that of a Supreme Court Justice?  

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David T. Prosser, Jr. is clearly guilty of assaulting a fellow justice.   It's as simple as that.  Prosser can't admit his guilt because he believes himself to be above the law.  No investigation using taxpayer funds is needed, not when a justice on that level makes such a claim.  Period!

Why Bankers Are Creeping Me Out

Last week I performed a refinance loan signing for someone who I later learned was a director of securities at Wells Fargo bank.  The couple was already pissed off at the loan facilitating bank prior to my arrival, something I'm familiar with in people sometimes wanting to vent and take out on me.  For instance, my last birthday evening was spent with a couple furious at Bank of America so much so that I thought they were going to rip my head off when I  arrived.  So just imagine a sight to behold of a bank executive upset over another bank's refinance loan practices? I was a sitting duck for potential abuse for sure.

The director from Wells Fargo was so upset with the bank that he refused to sign his middle initial in his name as was delineated in the signature block on the deed of trust.  He said he never signs his name with his middle initial and he just wouldn't do it.  I told the banker if he didn't sign his name exactly as listed in the signature block, the loan papers would have to be redrafted without the initial requirement.  He responded that he didn't care if the papers had to be redrafted and continued to sign all of the documents quite angrily.

When I was called back to perform the banker's signing a second time I was later informed he wanted to get his own notary public to do his paperwork.  Fearing I wouldn't be paid for my work and time, I contacted this bank executive who expressed regret I had informed the bank he refused to sign his name correctly.  Imagine that, a banker blaming me for doing my job!  That is my job and this banker behaved as though I had somehow tattled on him that caused his loan to be redone.  Often times in instances where loan documents have to be redrafted the loan signing agent (me) doesn't get paid unless they go back and redo the signing. This director at Wells Fargo was trying to make it look like I was responsible for the problem, that it was my fault somehow in his getting another notary to do the resigning.  A typical banker!

Let there be no doubt that bankers all over the country are a pain in the rear:

"As all of you are aware, I have many cases and field calls from all over the country where banks break into homes, change the locks, sometimes take property.

The banks fight aggressively, very aggressively and take the position that they have every legal right to invade the homes of Americans.  The banks take the position that when you take out a mortgage, you have given up your right to be protected by the law from unreasonable searches and seizures of your property.

Think about that Americans, and send this along to all your friends.  The banks have taken the position that they do not need court order or supervision of law enforcement when they decide to break into your home." - The Banks As Burglars, Why Are They Not Punished?  Why Are They Above The Law? - Matt Weidner Law Blog

Here's another example in the words of a lawyer in Florida:

"Lawyers that defend homeowners are being persecuted and crushed. Activists and homeowners who plead with  leaders for reasonable solutions are being crushed.  And our courts, buried under the wave of a crisis created by the banks are overwhelmed.  And the problems are only going to get much, much worse." - Take Back The Land Coming to the United States - Matt Weidner Blog

It's interesting to note when I asked the Wells Fargo director if he was in the financial industry, he responded with "no".  Bankers are good at lying!  Why would he lie?  Every time I deal with bankers at my local bank, they are so nosy and prying into my personal life, I just say as little as possible.  They always try very hard to make me believe they're truly interested and my friend.  Once in a while I come across a genuinely nice person working at a bank, but much of the time I keep my distance.  Sometimes when they ask probing personal questions I feel like responding with "it's none of your business!"

Whenever I do loan signings on behalf of Wells Fargo bank they ask if I can invoice them and it usually takes two months to get paid!   All I can say is these banks have some real nerve and audacity these days.  The worst of all of them is Bank of America, a bank that can burn in hell.  BofA's loan refinance documents are always a mess to deal with and their customers most always complain to me about this bank's incompetence.  A couple of lawyers I did a signing for once laughed at BofA's term for an additional fee as "padding" they found so hilarious they wanted to frame and hang the document on the wall.

A few nights ago I had a three hour loan signing to midnight with an auditor in the financial industry who works for VISA.  Though she was very nice, she scrutinized everything, and the banker who was in a conference call with us appeared to sound drunk being unable to answer her questions.  The banker was calling the borrower "sweetheart" and "darling" to the shock of the borrower who asked if she was on candid camera.

Most of my loan signing experiences with clients are very positive.   However there's always that 5% who want to take out their issues with their bank on me.

Americans Need To Prepare For Coming Financial Armageddon Now!

There are several different possibilities of what will occur should the U.S. default on its debt Americans need to be preparing for now.  Most people have no idea what to do since such an epic event has never happened before in their lifetimes.  This isn't the kind of problem one can live in denial over by putting on their headphones listening to a favorite song or watching a movie.  First and foremost, this is the time people should be stocking up on canned goods, food, water, toiletries and anything else they can think of, including for their pets welfare. Everyone should know that there will likely be rioting and much chaos everywhere.

"We are witnessing, in accelerated time, the total financial implosion of an empire. We're watching it burn right before our very eyes, and it was all set in motion in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve, of course.

This day is coming. We've been warning about it here on NaturalNews since at least 2008, when I held a phone seminar and warned people to buy gold and silver. (At that time, gold was in the $600 range. Today it's $1,600...) Actually, I'm on the record warning people about the dot-com bubble before it popped, and about the housing bubble before it popped, too. Now I'm warning about the coming collapse of the dollar, which now even mainstream people are beginning to see as a possibility. Even Obama himself said we need to increase the debt ceiling to avoid what he called, Financial Armageddon." - . . America's Currency Headed For Total Collapse - Natural News

Americans have been living in denial for quite some time that their country's been taken over by a band of brutal criminals.  When the shit hits the fan, many Americans' eyes will be forced wide opened that the U.S. is no longer theirs having been hijacked from them.  There will be no more time to watch television's lying talking heads, a movie, or sports event. Things are definitely going to get insane if there's a U.S. default. What it means is the U.S. dollar will become worthless and eventually likely replaced with a world currency. 

The wealthy in the U.S. will become poor overnight unless they were smart enough to exchange their money overseas and invest in precious metals. In fact, many of the wealthy are probably headed overseas right now to avoid the calamity.  If you can, now is the time to leave the United States that's sinking like the Titanic.

The first thing to remember is when society breaks down, there will likely be no typical police services.  The U.N. military forces might well be brought in to deal with the chaos.  For those unaware, U.N. forces have been trained to raid Americans' homes, ship them off to FEMA camps and/or kill them.  Those are just some of the potential horrors that await up ahead for many. 

People should be considering how to protect themselves from possible looters should government systems break down.   People should buy plenty of guns, ammo, pepper spray, stun guns, and defensive weapons they're able. While their at it, people should upgrade the security on their homes since looters will try to enter if they're not home.

If I were employed at a corporation having no real access to my 401K I would quit my job to gain access to the funds in order to quickly convert the dollars to tangible assets.  People who continue to work at their jobs are sitting ducks for devastation.  The dollar is headed for serious devaluing and inflation is going make everything very expensive. This could quite possibly be the final week of American's lives prior to chaos breaking lose in which America will never be the same again.  This could be it, the final days of normalcy Americans will have ever known in their lives prior to when the shit hits the fan and all hell breaks lose.  People should prepare for the worst now before it's too late.

Reasons I Chose To Be a Vexatious Litigant - I Just Couldn't Take It Anymore

I'm proud of litigant in pro se William Windsor who has defeated the corrupt U.S. Federal court system by saturating them with valid motions in his case against judicial tyranny.  In an article posted today Janet Phelan, an investigative reporter who specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption, states "how use of the vexatious litigant determination has been applied quite liberally of late".   Phelan provided an example of Casey and Marilyn Peters  who were deemed vexatious on the weight of filing only one lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court.

". . . a decision which impacted their ability to recoup monies allegedly stolen from them through decisions by Judge Aviva K. Bobb in probate court. They have also alleged misconduct by Bobb as pivotal in causing the death of Casey's mother, Lee Peters, who was a conservatee. The law explicitly does not allow an individual to be termed "vexatious" for filing one suit." - Access Denied: Judicial Reform Activist William Windsor Deemed Vexatious Litigant - ActivistsPost.com

What this means of course is if one stands up for their rights in a court of law, the court can claim vexatious litigant based on one case such as if it denotes challenging the judicial system in any way. That's how lawless those in the judicial system have become to cover up for their rigged judicial system.

I admit, a while back I went on a sneezing fit with a few lawsuits I filed.  The first one I filed in 2008 was meant to be a joke and means of rhetorical rants after the late 1990's of my being litigated against with two crazy restraining orders in which lawyers generated a lot of fees for themselves.  In my lawsuit against the law firm of Baker & McKenzie LLP, a billion dollar a year global law firm, I had a wonderful time mocking the legal culture that had been allowing perjury, great exaggerations and all kinds of nonsense in restraining orders filed against me years prior.  For anyone who'd like to view my loads of laughs litigation here are a few I filed:

1.  Response to Defendant's Demurrer

2.  Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint


In the late 1990's attorneys had taken my minor disputes at a corporation where I had left a paper trail,  as well as that of roommate conflict opportunities I recently posted about and blew them up as a cover for their client's actions and behavior.  Years later I set the tone of what was to follow of my own litigation activity after getting to know the legal system from within working 10 years at such law firms as Kirkland & Ellis LLP (2 years), Pillsbury Winthrop LLP (3.5 years), Preston, Gates & Ellis LLP (1 year) and Morrison & Foerster LLP (1 year).  If I was such the kind of person these restraining orders claimed, how could I possibly last at such a strict anal law firm as Kirkland & Ellis or Pillsbury?

How I Evolved Into a Vexatious Litigant

After graduating from such an experience working for attorneys as a legal word processor, I then got a paralegal certificate that enabled me loads of fun filing a frivolous lawsuit against Baker & McKenzie LLP.  Yes, I knew my claim was frivolous, but I wanted to document what I experienced being burned multiple times by one of their lesbian employees in HR who was clearly enjoying devastating me with backstabbing games.  I didn't have a lawful case just an ethical one that genuinely caused me emotional distress since I was promised a job there. I suffered months with pay below my usual salary and they kept deliberately devastating me in the most humiliating ways possible.  Yes, I knew all along my lawsuit wouldn't fly but venting in the lawsuit was well worth it to me.  I had loads of fun, it was a blast suing the law firm in pro se.  My favorite part was when I wrote my concerns Baker & McKenzie as a global law firm was superseding the U.S. court system since it was quite obvious the judge wasn't bothering to read my responding briefs.

I've dealt with what I consider to be Nazi based female management oppressing me at law firms over petty ridiculous matters they intentionally provoked for years.  I was thus many times laughing rolling on the floor having loads of fun litigating over silly matters and experiences at a big name law firm.  I also submitted interrogatories wanting phone records of conversation of the HR person over her preferred employee  who she allowed to steal a job from me.

I'm sure lawyers equally laughed over the tremendous farce they created in the late 90's to cover up their clients' conduct where I had left paper trails.  Without my paper trails they had no case whatsoever against me for anything.   In any event, last year I was declared a vexatious litigant primarily due to my litigation debut of my Baker & McKenzie LLP lawsuit, something well worth it to me.   I didn't have to but later paid Baker & McKenzie their $370 filing fee and was done with it.

I never at any moment took my lawsuit against Baker & McKenzie seriously, it was nothing but a joke on them and my official departure working 10 long grueling years at law firms.  Yes, I deserve the vexatious litigant label based on the B&M lawsuit.  I'm sorry for those litigants who don't deserve the label, such as Mr. Windsor, but the courts are so corrupt these days it's best not to file any lawsuit unless you want to make a mockery of the legal system in doing so.

A Losing Battle With A Rigged & Highly Political Court System

These people in the legal system must win at all costs.  You either mock them in litigation in pro se, or lose your serious lawsuit they will mock one way or another.  As for my lawsuits against cyber stalkers, I filed those quite seriously.  I wish I wouldn't have, but I felt I had to.  I won a default judgment and the other one was dismissed.


I'm sorry Mr. Windsor received his vexatious litigant determination as well as the others in this post.  I clearly deserved mine based on my initial lawsuit. I didn't bother to attend the hearing an attorney attended to address my litigation against he and his client.  Judge's do whatever they want these days and the court system is clearly rigged in favor of its players.  When it gets so bad, for some it comes down to simply a matter of mocking the system for what it is, a rigged lawyer's and judges game.

Unfortunately, my B&M case affected the outcome of one of my cases against a cyber stalker.  I have no idea if what I encountered working at B&M was influenced by materials the cyber stalker had posted about me which contributed to their playing games.  In any event, my head was being played with by various individuals that I felt it was intentional and destructive towards me.  I just felt I had to do something to counter it all.

Cop Kicked Out of Coffee House By Free Thinking American Business Owner

In an earlier post I suggested a good way for a community to deal with their local police officers' offensive actions, such as when they go about arresting people over an event to feed their community's poor, is to deny them service at restaurants and businesses they frequent.  Under many jurisdictions, business owners may lawfully refuse service to anyone for any lawful reason.   

The videos below provide a good example of how a free thinking American local coffee cafe business owner in Portland Oregon bravely denied services to a police officer.  When police activities become damaging to a community there's a means to respond as such by organizing outraged local business owners to make it clear the corruption will not be tolerated.

The videos below demonstrate how people can organize fearlessly to deal with police corruption in their communities. 

One can observe the rejected Police Officer Jim Crooker enjoying displaying his charm to the media and the support of a local sympathizing woman who blogged over feeling sorry for him. It's these kind of blind women, Cornelia Seigneur, who allow themselves to be easily conned by police officers they sometimes allow into their bedrooms.  Yes I do wonder if the officer got into this lady's bedroom.

A small uproar over the incident ensued in which the officer, through his conduit female witness, complained to the media over being discriminated against for the color of his uniform.  The uproar caused the Red and Black Cafe coffee house owner Jim Langely to later call a press conference with the media about why the officer was refused services being asked to leave.

A local business owner Jim Langley explains at a media press conference why he asked the police officer to leave his Portland Oregon coffee house.

I don't know if the laws allow denial of service in certain jurisdictions across the country. If anyone's considering denying police entry to their business or for goods and services, they will need to check their local laws.  My guess is if the police are largely denied local community business services on a wide scale, there will eventually be legislation to prevent this kind of thing. 

Let there be no doubt, in spite of the friendly mask the police officer wore to the camera, the coffee business owner has evoked dark forces having risked his life to stand up to police corruption.  Depending on the degree of corruption in the community, Langley may be found dead one day by some mysterious accident in which police will block investigation much like the one I posted about earlier of Sunny Sheu's murder and the subsequent cover-up for his standing up to a corrupt judge. 

When people stand up to cop corruption, they're literally putting their lives on the line dealing with a group of Mafia like criminal gang of crooks. Mr. Langley's a brave and honorable man, I wish there were more people like him willing to stand up to police corruption in this manner. 

Officer Crooked!  Officer Crook!

Inappropriate Use of Police Services At Tax Payer Expense Common in America

This is just another example of police services being used inappropriately in avoiding performing crime fighting duties on behalf of tax payers.  The bicycle cops in Los Angeles (aka the LAPD), apparently having few crimes to prosecute because of so many angels in their small community of several million, have finally found a worthy target to focus their time on.  Ever since the LAPD's disastrous world debut on the Rodney King and O.J. Simpson cases, Angelinos have been wondering what the cops would be doing with their lame ass over paid pitiful selves.

Since 2010, the LAPD has since uncovered a huge threat posed to local restaurant establishments in targeting those friendly little mobile food van street vendors.  These vendors are a long tradition in America bringing much comfort and relief to employees as well as competition to the local restaurant establishments. 

The following YouTube comment says it all:

This boggles the mind. The City of LA issued these trucks permits, and yet the CITY Police are hassling them? The LAPD should stop this bull crap. If the City issued a permit for trucks, then the truck is legal, what more do the LAPD need to know? Meanwhile, a store is getting robbed, and people might die, but the LAPD takes 30 minutes to get there, Because their busy with a Taco truck. Are you kidding me! - YouTube video comment. 

Unfortunately, this Mafia like police activity is becoming a pattern across the United States.  (See Mobile Food Vendors Get The Boot - St. Louis Today)  When police become nothing more than servants of corporations at tax payer expense, citizens know things are running amiss.  Is this the function of the police to be harassing and annoying these business operators as such who are clearly following the law in many cases?  It's okay to be asking for permits, but a chronic unjustified ticketing system of these operators is clearly designed to drive them out of the chosen area.

This video from last year highlights how the LAPD bike police are used for harassment, much like the Mafia, on behalf of local restaurant competition. 

A lady actually went to jail for 45 days for selling bacon wrapped hot dogs!  Such a food combination has been declared unsafe by the health department.  Was it really unsafe or just another one of those tactics the FDA uses to protect the pharmaceutical industry from healthy food companies?  - YouTube Video

Why are police trying to take away a much needed service from their communities?  After all, these mobile food vans are a large tradition in America serving a genuine need for food access convenience and expediency.  The answer is that the local restaurant establishments are complaining to the police that likely offered free meals in return for their assistance.  If this form of bribery is so, the police are therefore acting more like the Mafia would protecting their own interests, not that of the tax payers. 

This story may not seem serious to some, but if this kind of police mentality takes root as it already  has in many jurisdictions such as New York and Chicago, it will grow like wild weed.  If the restaurants aren't providing good food or services, they need to improve instead of complaining to and bribing the police over their competition's activities.  The cops shouldn't be participating in such extreme targeting and harassment using Mafia methods of intimidation against restaurants' competition.

I've always questioned just how effective police services really are and have since come to a conclusion police largely work for their own political interests stealing from and oppressing the tax payer in a form of class warfare.

Man Arrested For Burglary Of His Own Home By Keystone Cops in Lufkin Texas

This story is as crazy as it gets demonstrating the insanity of law enforcement and the court system these days.  In March 2009 a neighbor called the police because he claimed to have observed a black man kick in the front door of a home in Lufkin Texas.  After nine police officers arrived, they found a man who didn't speak English hiding in the bathroom.  Turns out Marco Saucedo, 30, was the legal owner of the home.

"Saucedo, who doesn’t speak English, did not comply and police entered the home, finding that he had locked himself in the bathroom, according to Lufkin  county prosecutor Gary Taylor. Taylor on Tuesday played dashboard camera video for the jury of five men and a woman in County Court-at-Law No. 2 Judge Derek Flournoy’s courtroom." - Lufkin Daily News

The police officers sprayed pepper spray under the bathroom door forcing Saucedo out only to pepper ball gun him multiple times when he resisted arrest.  Saucedo was injured in the incident with a large gash to his head.  In spite of the fact Saucedo had done nothing initially wrong and owned the home, the police still sought to prosecute him for resisting arrest. Today Saucedo's facing a trial for resisting arrest for the unlawful entry by police officers into his home who essentially tortured him.

It wasn't enough the Keystone cops in Lufkin Texas came into a home unlawfully to torture an innocent home owner, that they had to prosecute him for resisting their unlawful arrest? What kind of monsters are these people?  

Real human beings would have a conscience they tortured a man in his own home and just call it a day.  Instead these beasts of burden terminator machines decided when they didn't have a real burglar they should continue to remain dominating something, anything, for their bruised egos.  The beasts  decided torture wasn't enough that they had to file charges against Saucedo for "resisting arrest."

These are some very ugly evil people not only in law enforcement but the court system. They care nothing of the terror they caused this poor home owner, the pain and torture, and now a trial for human inclination of an innocent person to resist arrest. It's only natural human instinct to want to protect one's self from such an invasion as such. They expect us to just lay down and let them run all over us without just cause.  They're too busy focusing on prosecuting an innocent home owner while not doing their jobs of finding real criminals and that should be a crime in itself since they work for the Lufkin county tax payers!

These cops violate basic human decency towards their fellow human beings. The laws of karma are in full force and effect which they can never escape.  The beasts disrupt the electromagnetic life force grid and will be paying a heavy price for their evil acts one day.

There are some very sick people in the court and legal system.  God help us all.

Judge Katherine Feinstein Threatens: 'You Won't Be Able to Sue That Unscrupulous Roommate!'

At yesterday's press conference in San Francisco as referenced in my last post, it was interesting to note the Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein included with the news of layoffs and severe cutbacks in court services a statement about suing roommates:

"Our citizens will have to wait for years to peacefully resolve their disputes," Feinstein said. There will be "nowhere to go to sue an unscrupulous roommate, get a divorce or sue a reckless driver who injured you in a car accident."

Source: The Bay Citizen (http://s.tt/12Sav)

 "'Our citizens will have to wait for years to peacefully resolve their disputes,' Feinstein said. There will be 'nowhere to go to sue an unscrupulous roommate, get a divorce or sue a reckless driver who injured you in a car accident.'" - Massive Cut to Court Budget Stalls Most Civil Cases - Bay Citizen

"Our citizens will have to wait for years to peacefully resolve their disputes," Feinstein said. There will be "nowhere to go to sue an unscrupulous roommate, get a divorce or sue a reckless driver who injured you in a car accident."Source: The Bay Citizen (http://s.tt/12Sav)

I find that statement interesting since back in 1999 I was a victim of someone wanting to make me out to be an unscrupulous roommate in order to obtain one of the best lease deals in San Francisco.  I had lived there 3.5 years and eventually was on the lease as a joint tenant. I learned the police were being called onto the property while I was working the late night shift in 1998 at Morrison & Foerster LLP,  working long hours sometimes until 5:00 a.m. in the morning.

My story below is an example of how the court is actually encouraging dysfunction in our culture to generate income for its business enterprise:

It's public record a self employed former roommate, Joyce Cassells, had been court evicted in San Francisco five times in five years, declared bankruptcy twice in 12 years (1995 & 2004), and was evicted from the well respected Progress Foundation where she put into her own words her mental health issues, conflicts and complaints about people. (See PDF)  Ms. Cassells was also evicted by the Mary Beth Inn for non-payment of rent.  In spite of not paying $850 a month rent an entire year, Ms. Cassells contested that eviction as well.  Shortly thereafter filing for bankruptcy, somehow Ms. Cassells was able to obtain three consecutive student loans totaling $90,000 which enabled her to go on a rampage of tax payer funded police and court services to take over the lease to the property where I lived.

The late LGBT author Betty Fairchild, who at the time was 78, and myself didn't ever run to the police for whatever caused us distress such as when this roommate  kicked in the front door and broke off the chain, locked out Ms. Fairchild so she had to go to the back door, harassed Ms. Fairchild to move with little stickers on her door that said "get a life", entered Ms. Fairchild's room while she was on vacation to tamper with her VCR damaging it, turned up the heater on warm days, replaced toilet seats with flimsy plastic temporary ones without consent, put her crazy looking unframed finger painting artwork in the hallway without discussion.

Instead of running to the police, Ms. Fairchild as the leaseholder contacted her lawyer who did not do his job. Since the case wouldn't generate any money for him, the lawyer gave bad advice by suggesting asking Ms. Cassells to move might cause legal difficulties. This was completely false since at the time Ms. Cassells only rented a room not having had any lease agreement.

When Ms. Cassells first moved onto the property in 1996 she brought attention to herself by harassing the landlord to provide paint materials for her two rooms.  The landlord thereby sent us all letters threatening to potentially evict us since the deal was so incredible we were receiving.  Three years later after Ms. Fairchild moved from the property where she had lived 12 years and after the landlord sold the building, Ms. Cassells began a manipulative campaign to make me look like a bad tenant, contacting the neighbors, the new building owner and continually calling the police over petty matters.  At the time there was an extreme housing crisis in San Francisco in 1998-99 that caused me to remain in a tremendous deal where I only paid $325 a month rent.
 

One evening I came home to find my dishes had been removed from the shelves where a cryptic handwritten note said "I pay 70% of the rent and you therefore only have 30% of the common area space" totally unlawful harassment.  Ms. Cassells. got in my face that evening where I yelled at her prompting another call to the police.  The police were called in that evening where Ms. Cassells obtained favor with the police for her bullying activities. I later learned the police came onto my property without hesitation for any petty matter when I wasn't home where they'd record the alleged incidents with their little ticket notation system.

The police continued to be called without my knowledge for such things as moving in my fish aquarium, replacing the kitchen carpet, and allegedly smearing shoe polish on the bathtub and leaving feces on the toilet.  Ms. Cassells complained to the police over my allegedly not flushing the toilet.  One day a college student I was helping with research using my computer witnessed Ms. Cassells talking to a local foot police officer about "missing rags and light bulbs" and couldn't believe it.

In spite of the fact my lawyer had disclosed to the court Ms. Cassells had been evicted five times in five years and was trying to obtain the entire lease fraudulently, it still backed her up due to all the police visits to the property.

So, when the San Francisco Superior Court sided with this person and many of her petty complaints against me forcing me to move with a 3 foot restraining order, I say it's best that the court no longer be encouraging these kind of lawsuits. Especially those kind of cases where lawyers rely on people's student loan funds and/or credit cards to pay them in which their clients later declare bankruptcy for free legal services.

My other experiences with courts such as in Walnut Creek demonstrated the courts are attempting to entrap people to generate income for the local legal community.  They aren't disputing outrageous lies in accepting cases by paranoid schizophrenic cyber stalkers who have no evidence to back up their claims, making their victims guilty based on perjury.  I was later able to obtain a $25K  judgment against this guy in 2010, no thanks to the court or legal system based solely on my hard work and witnesses testimony.

My experience has been the courts are encouraging people to be dysfunctional and complain which is why the little comment by Judge Feinstein "you wont be able to file a lawsuit against an unscrupulous roommate" speaks of their marketing campaign to attract business for themselves.  People should be able to resolve their roommate issues without court intervention that's draining on the tax payers in every respect of the word.  This roommate accused me in her attorney's extensive litigation of "lacking common sense" and went on about her alleged genius peer approved intelligence. The R.O. litigation must have cost a few thousand dollars.

"The lease on Lincoln Way included 3.5 bedrooms, two fireplaces, a backyard with patio and motorcycle parking enclave, two car garage, kitchen pantry and high coffer ceilings being next to Golden Gate Park near shopping and Muni public transportation to downtown.  The rent was $1,250 at the time I was forced by the court to move."

When the court is encouraging people to come into court to lie or exaggerate minor conflicts in order to justify itself and generate income for the local legal community, you know it's a corrupt system that needs to be dismantled in one form or another.  The court made me a scapegoat to Ms. Cassells problems.

"SF has the biggest budget of any city its size in the ENTIRE COUNTRY. Last week I commented that the sane, taxpaying, responsible citizens of SF appeared to be stirring. I hope it continues. This article is nothing but the usual tripe of "let's close the Washington monument to balance the federal budget" BS. Don't let 'em scare you into higher taxes. You already pay the highest anywhere. Demand efficiency, folks! Or at least some smaller levels of typical government inefficiency." Commenter -  S.F. Courts Warn Of Budget Disaster - SFGate.com

My audio on the experience I had living with Ms. Cassells from 1996-1999.  (MP3)

San Francisco Judicial Parasites Whine Over 'Courtmageddon' Budget Hack

As I was writing this post, moments ago a former Paul Hastings attorney in San Francisco called for a unique service request claiming the traffic court's attempting to steal money from her by lying about court hearing dates. She's in another state so she can't immediately deal with it.  When I told her what my fee would be, she slightly paused. Imagine that, an attorney complaining about my fee dealing with San Francisco court's corruption!  It was kind of funny to witness an attorney pause over a mere $75 dollars considering what attorneys charge these days.

Much like the wealthy bankers complained they needed a tax payer bailout back in 2008 only to handsomely reward their employees with huge bonuses as too big to fails, today will mark the  blackmail campaign to threaten San Franciscans with a near collapse of service over civil court matters.  Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein will release a statement today over the alleged service cuts.

What I'm reading into this following quote is that they are unable to provide much of any civil services to San Franciscans:

"It will take a year and a half to get a divorce in San Francisco and to get a child custody order. If you file suit, we won't do anything with your case for five years," court spokesperson Ann Donlan said. Paying a traffic ticket could mean waiting in line for five hours. 

'We're basically talking about the suspension of most civil actions in court,' Dolan said. While the criminal court in the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. will remain open, most courtrooms at a second courthouse at 400 McAllister St. in Civic Center will be closed." - Courtmageddon Looms After Budget Cuts - The Bay Citizen

We're basically talking about the suspension of most civil actions in court," she said. While the criminal court in the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. will remain open, most courtooms at a second courthouse at 400 McAllister St. in Civic Center will be closed.
Donlan said the cuts are the result of a state budget that eliminated $350 million from courts throughout California, leaving the San Francisco Superior Court with a $13.75 million deficit.
"This is the worst crisis in legal services that I can think of in my professional career in more than 20 years," said Bill Hebert, a San Francisco lawyer who is president of the State Bar of California.

Source: The Bay Citizen (http://s.tt/12R9X)

We're basically talking about the suspension of most civil actions in court," she said. While the criminal court in the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. will remain open, most courtooms at a second courthouse at 400 McAllister St. in Civic Center will be closed.
Donlan said the cuts are the result of a state budget that eliminated $350 million from courts throughout California, leaving the San Francisco Superior Court with a $13.75 million deficit.
"This is the worst crisis in legal services that I can think of in my professional career in more than 20 years," said Bill Hebert, a San Francisco lawyer who is president of the State Bar of California.

Source: The Bay Citizen (http://s.tt/12R9X)

We're basically talking about the suspension of most civil actions in court," she said. While the criminal court in the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. will remain open, most courtooms at a second courthouse at 400 McAllister St. in Civic Center will be closed.
Donlan said the cuts are the result of a state budget that eliminated $350 million from courts throughout California, leaving the San Francisco Superior Court with a $13.75 million deficit.
"This is the worst crisis in legal services that I can think of in my professional career in more than 20 years," said Bill Hebert, a San Francisco lawyer who is president of the State Bar of California.

Source: The Bay Citizen (http://s.tt/12R9X)

This parasitical civil court system in San Francisco is full of many nasty highly political people who are rude towards local citizens.  Getting anything accomplished in even the Small Claims Court is a difficult feat since judges do whatever they want.  Last year Judge Ulmer whitewashed my smoking gun evidence for a restraining order against a longstanding cyberstalker, allowing an attorney to sabotage me with attorney fees.  I wasn't even allowed to testify in my own case as Plaintiff, being totally cut off and calculatedly humiliated.

"This is the worst crisis in legal services that I can think of in my professional career in more than 20 years," said Bill Hebert, a San Francisco lawyer who is president of the State Bar of California. The Bay Citizen 

It's been speculated approximately 40%  business at the San Francisco probate court is dedicated to stealing millions of dollars from its local senior citizens through improper custodianship court appointments.  See blog Conservator Abuse & the San Francisco Probate Court

My guess is they're blackmailing the public into forcing the city to get more money into their coffers to provide services they're already paid handsomely for along with their luxury pensions.  The local legal community is reeling from the news that would be severely impeded by such threats.  Five years to process a lawsuit?  That would drive these attorneys insane!

Lighten Up Sundays: Hilarious Viral Cat Videos

This blog is full of a lot of seriously scary topics lately so I decided to implement a Lighten Up On Sundays section.   Today's viral video theme is about cats.

The first video is an eHarmony lady named Debbie's attempt to get a date with her video that's since been songified and uploaded last week.  The video without music is funny enough to watch. Since  uploaded in June, the original video's had over 12 million views.

This songify video has over 3 million views since it was uploaded a week ago.

Kittens show talent as DJ's imitating human activity.

Another cat showing DJ skill promise.

Cat investigates an iPad

Cat investigates video game.

I've posted this one before of Nora the piano playing cat.