Alex Jones Latest Message Goes Viral

This video was put up July 8th and two days later it has 218,000 views!  It's going to be one of Alex Jones' big classics one day.  Particularly, this video covers many topics from LeBron James worship to what television has done to American's that's personally relevant for me. I've wasted much of my early life in front of the tube being brainwashed wasting away my potential and mind.

Listening to Alex Jones and watching many of his superb documentaries like End Game, Obama Deception and 9/11 Truth Rising has helped me convert over from being an ignorant liberal into a free thinking American.  I stopped watching television in 2007 and have saved $80/month on Comcast fees.  I now invest that fee into a local gym for $68/mo.  This doesn't mean I worship Alex Jones or have any crush on him however.  It's not about the man, it's about the message.

I have a real core to myself I never had prior that no one can take away from me. Because inherent rights granted to the individual by the U.S. Constitution are adverse to today's government goals, I know when judges are out-of-whack violating people's Constitutional rights.  I know when law enforcement is out-of-line.  I have a growing sense of myself, spirit and individuality.  When you know people are trying to take your God given rights from you and they're in the wrong, it empowers you tremendously.  I am also no longer an atheist, but an agnostic.

I'm grateful for Alex Jones' talents and hard work.  He always makes me feel I need to be doing more to spread the word of what's happening.  I copied his classic End Game DVD a while back and distributed them around my local community.  I was really getting into promoting his message until he tore into a dead Michael Jackson before his burial.  I don't care who it is, if you're going to say something bad about someone other than a real criminal, you don't go about ripping apart a man whose body isn't even cold yet.  That goes for Senator Byrd's passing too.  Alex knew what he did was wrong. Sometimes he can't control himself and he admits it to his listening audience that he's not perfect and has problems like the rest of us.

Yesterday I was amazed when I listened to Ted Nugent's interview on the Alex Jones radio program. I had no idea how smart this former 70's rocker is and that he's still around today. I didn't like his music or act way back when, but he's a pretty interesting person to listen to.

The Fourth of July turned out to be an explosive weekend all around for entertainer Ted Nugent. Released Friday, July 2, his Happy Defiance Day Everyday song bundle went to #1 on Amazon’s MP3 store on Saturday, July 3, and has remained there ever since. Due to the buzz on Yahoo! as a #1 trending topic on Friday, this was released two days earlier than its intended July 4 release date.
 
This 30-track collection is available for 76 cents, in honor of 1776. Nugent’s dynamic version of the "Star Spangled Banner" also topped downloads over the holiday.
 
Rocking his fellow Americans, Ted spent the holiday weekend on his live Trample The Weak Hurdle The Deadtour, as it continues to roll across the USA. "This is, without question, the best tour of my 60-plus years on the planet!" enthused the irrepressible guitarist just before taking the stage in San Antonio on Sunday, July 4. "Remember the Alamo!"

I guess what all this means is I'm no longer a liberal or democrat. In fact, I'm with Jesse Ventura being against political parties of any kind.  This doesn't mean I'm against gay rights by the way, I just think it's a little out of hand in San Francisco.

Okay, so  that's enough about Alex Jones for now.  I listen to his radio program every day. Sometimes he's brilliant and has great people to interview. I love most all of Jones' guests with a few exceptions.   Sometimes Jones is horrendous to listen to.  Like all of us he has his good and bad days.

Woman Fired For Being Too Hot Sues Citibank

When I saw this story, I literally died of laughter.  There are so many lawyers filing frivolous lawsuits, it's a business for them.  Attorneys sucker their clients into paying them to file lawsuits  and the courts could care less.  As for pro pers (i.e., self represented), well that's a different story.  Certain judges despise dealing with pro pers.  If you're a pro per filing a lawsuit, you need to make sure the judge doesn't have a reputation for being adverse to pro pers. You will lose no matter what case you file. Believe it or not, judges play politics.

"In blatantly discriminatory fashion, plaintiff (Debrahlee Lorenzana) was advised that as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly 'too distracting' for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear."

The sexy single mom pointed out to her bosses "that other female colleagues wore similar professional attire," and that some dressed far more provocatively, the filing says.

 But this is the hilarious part:

But her supervisors shot back that those women didn't have to worry about turning them on "as their general unattractiveness rendered moot their sartorial choices, unlike plaintiff," the papers say.

Read more: -NY Post Article

It sounds to me like lawyers are merely using their case for entertainment value of the public. This lady has no case because it doesn't fall into the civil rights areas of employment law.  They can fire anyone at any time for any reason. This isn't sexual harassment but the opposite.  The supervisors were just being honest and professional with her.  The lawyers who filed this case and those who responded are trying to entertain the public and get in the media.  Judges know these are deliberately frivolous and rarely punish lawyers. 

The Ocean Metaphor

I love to use metaphors because they're powerful tools of communication reaching into the depths of people's psyches into another dimension.  I've recently learned you've got to be careful when you use metaphors though because Judges and other similar mindsets tend to take words literally.   Those who think one dimensionally can't handle metaphors much. 

A metaphor is an analogy between two objects or ideas; the analogy is conveyed by the use of a metaphorical word in place of some other word.

Examples: "Her eyes were glistening jewels" or "In Los Angeles traffic, the highways are a prison" - Wikipedia

The fact is, metaphors can take on a life of their own and are quite magical to discover and unlock the power of.  One might possibly find peace in a metaphor of the ocean being much like the human subconscious mind for what's happening now.  For anyone aware of the power of their subconscious mind lingering below the day-to-day mechanical working on the surface, they might find peace knowing nothing mankind could ever do will destroy life's creation.  It would be similar to little men on earth trying to destroy the universe!

As evil greedy people find ways to try and destroy the ocean, here we have a new discovery of life in the Atlantic Ocean of incredible mystery and beauty.   These life forms took millions of years to evolve on our planet and a few low life forms called greedy men want to destroy it all in a matter of a few years.  Shallow, greedy men and their Queens who own oil companies like BP, will never know true wealth of their spirits or ever dive deep into their subconscious minds for secret treasure discoveries.  They'll remain on the surface of life void of any depth of understanding the true meaning we were placed on earth.

One forum's comment responding to some one's preference for nuking ocean:

Well, maybe the physicists don’t have a problem with it but many of the oil geologists do. Virtually all the experts on the geology of oil and deep sea drilling say that an explosion in the gulf is very very risky because of the unique composition of the seabed there. There is a good chance bombing or nuking the spill would not close the well, but would create thousands of unstable fissures in the seafloor spewing even more oil– such a scenario would make Armageddon look tame.

Beware of anyone who says they think the ocean should be nuked!  Such a foolish statement is a good way of judging that person's mindset.  Anyone who thinks they know whether the ocean should be nuked is a fool. So when ex President Clinton suggests nuking the ocean, you know he's got the mind of a sociopath.  He knows how risky such a feat would be, that could be far worse.  Anyone willing to take that risk of nuking the ocean to stop several leaks on the bottom of the ocean has got to be insane in one form or another.  The people who allowed the drilling under the risks they took are equally insane in my opinion.

To put it simply, men with large egos and those thirsty for power in ruling the world are slowly going into a deep insanity and desperation for control. Einstein will be turning in his grave should they use a nuke on the ocean or even on Iran.

Scary U.S. Economy Video Commentator

This guy Howard Davidowitz scares me! He's really intense and I had no idea what I was getting into when I started watching it but couldn't stop.  I haven't been watching television at all and it's really shocking to hear these guys go off the deep end with such a sense of panic.

Was the 1938 Radio Broadcast of War of the Worlds a Social Experiment?

The infamous 1938 War of the Worlds radio broadcast was meant to be entertainment but many back then took the news bulletin style presentation to mean Martians were invading the United States.  Others with perhaps harder hearing believed they heard Germans were invading.

The program was adapted from H.G. Wells novel War of the Worlds. This, coupled with the talents of Orson Wells, made the broadcast seem all too real to some, especially who thought it meant the Germans were invading.

Here are some examples of the effects of the radio broadcast:

Seattle CBS affiliate stations KIRO and KVI broadcast Orson Welles' radio drama. While this broadcast was heard around the country, it made a deep impact in Concrete, Washington. At the point where the Martian invaders were invading towns and the countryside with flashes of light and poison gases and the lights were going down, there was a loud explosion and a power failure plunged almost the entire town of 1,000 into darkness.

Some listeners fainted while others grabbed their families to head into the mountains. Others headed for the hills to guard their moonshine stills. One was said to have jumped up out of his chair and, in bare feet, run two miles to the center of town. Some men grabbed their guns, and one Catholic businessman got his wife into the car, drove to the nearest service station and demanded gasoline. Without paying the attendant, he rushed to Bellingham, Washington (50 miles away) to see his priest for a last-minute absolution of sins. He reportedly told the gas-station attendant that paying for the gas "[wouldn't] make any difference, everyone is going to die!"

I don't think they intentionally meant to deceive people with this broadcast, but there's good reason to believe it all turned out to be a helpful study for social scientists of the future in the mass population's response.

Today many people are still naive and will believe anything the media and government presents to them.  So, if the government wants to push through an inoculation program, they plant an overblown story to get the population scared to approve of their plans.  If they want a war on Iran, they claim they've got nukes, etc.   Another example is the global warming scare, stirring up fear based on falsified scientific data in order to get a carbon tax on the entire world population.

I believe this War of the World's radio broadcast has been studied by social scientists who have aided in bringing the government's plans to fruition with methods of fear and panic.  The only question now is when and where will the next manufactured staged false flag event come from?

What Causes Men to Dominate Women? Their Egos!

Last year around this time I took one of my few vacations in recent years to Las Vegas because it was inexpensive and I hadn't been there in a decade. I really wanted to see the Venetian Hotel and other architectural wonders I had never visited before.  I would be gone for a total of three nights.  Unfortunately one of the cyber stalkers I've referred to on this blog as cyber #2, made sure my trip would be rudely interrupted.

The cyber had walked into his local Walnut Creek court and lied to a judge claiming I had stalked his girlfriend and sent him a threatening letter.  None of this was true, and there was no evidence I sent him anything since the letter was postmarked from Vancouver Washington!  The cyber was simply afraid I had obtained enough evidence against him to file my own restraining order so he wanted the upper hand.  On the second day of my trip, I was called by a process server who did not believe my claim I wasn't home.  When I arrived back from the trip, a restraining order was left hanging on my door.  The server claimed I had lied that I wasn't home and wouldn't open my door. 

In spite of the fact I had never contacted this stranger cyber #2 in any form and an affidavit and ultimate court testimony that another from Vancouver Washington sent the letter, Judge Joel Golub overruled my contesting lack of jurisdiction and any evidence against me of ever contacting cyber #2.  Instead, the judge had ruled based on one of my blog articles I had expressed intent to get gun training at Front Site in Las Vegas for my protection.  I had only considered gun training due to an Alex Jones site advertisement.  Due to this article, the judge issued a restraining order against me, violating my First and Second Amendment Rights.  Judge Joel H. Golub violated the statute which governs restraining orders and non conviens jurisdiction, allowing someone who called himself George Orwell in his email identities, to carry out a Big Brother kind of operation.

Essentially, a middle aged white guy of 55, who had been cyber stalking and writing serious defamation about me and others on blogs and various sites, viewed himself as a government big brother operative. He walked into the local court to lie about me and the judge later overruled valid objections of lack of jurisdiction and evidence.  This self proclaimed government spy and wanna be James Bond turned in my blog article and claimed I posted stuff about him, much of which was posted by another party he had a conflict with long ago.

Cyber #1 - Self Appointed FBI Informant Who Continually Files Complaints

In another example case, cyber #1 walked into his local court in the East County of San Diego after I complained to his attorney Randall Dierlam that he had been recently sending me harassing obscene emails about the recent deposition and lawsuit I filed against him. I also received a veiled gun violence related death threat from him which he forwarded to me from the USENET forum.  I had reported cyber #1's contacts to the La Mesa Police who visited his home to question him. Lo and behold, cyber #1 went to complain to his local Judge Longstreth about my lawful activities and requested a restraining order.

Judge Longstreth did not apparently consider my strong response.  The judge obliged to grant a TRO  based on whatever perjury and illusions cyber #1 had created over the dispute.  For instance, blog articles written six months prior about the grim reaper and the death of Internet 2.0 were submitted to give enough of an appearance for any reason to issue a restraining order. I was also accused of filling out a form on a website to the cyber though there was no IP address associated with that message.  I did not ever contact this cyber #1 other than for cease and desist letters and through the legal processes.

I began filing motions to delay the issuing of a restraining order against me, because it was clear to me Judge Robert C. Longstreth was looking forward to ruling against me.  He should have never issued any TRO and it was clear he was abusing his discretion, something many judges do when the rules are broad.  I wanted the case moved to the jurisdiction of the lawsuit and also filed a prejudicial declaration in requesting a new judge.  Judge Longstreth was so pissed off I had delayed the case, he made some statement on record in order to damage my lawsuit, claiming I "had the wrong man" in my lawsuit.  Such was not true, there was just an additional man in Los Angeles who was involved. These guys were both guilty of cyber stalking and terrorizing me since 2007.

Judge Longstreth's on the campaign trail again for his judge position since his Governor appointed seat is being contested with several complaints.  People are upset by this judge, who has a large gay and lesbian following by the way.  He's been reported to have conducted his initial campaign unethically threatening local attorneys in San Diego for not supporting him that he would rule against their cases.  Here's a clip from one of his adversaries who sent me an email:

"Judge Longstreth has some fair political practices complaints for donation shakedowns of attorneys demanding that they donate to his campaign. There will be a CJP complaint filed based on his commenting on his cases during his election campaign and violating judicial cannon 5.

I believe he has had several complaints to CJP in the short time he has been judge (14 months) and he has created so much hate and discontent.  This organizations are slow but it is something the Elkins Task Force is addressing when Pro Per are frustrated by judges like this, we need to complain and make sure we are heard." 

The Bottom Line - Men Work Together to Dominate Single Women Whenever They're Able

I've noted many times throughout my life now how men work together to lie and create illusions in order to dominate me as single women who stands up to their dominating oppressive activities.  I've been a former secretary to men and enslaved to them for many years. I so much as deviate in any way from being their servant and they go into a tizzy!  Restraining orders are among several vehicles egoistic men use to fabricate, lie and humiliate with.  Typically, they will often use women as a front to carry out their plans whom they also dominate.  Thus, restraining orders have been falsely issued to me by these judges who could care less they violated my 1) First Amendment Rights 2) Second Amendment Rights (right to bear arms).  When you stand up to some harassing man in the workplace, they'll make sure you suffer for it as well any way they're able.

We Can Harass You All We Want - When You File a Lawsuit to Complain, We'll Make You Pay Lawyer's Fees!

Think of a money making machine men have in place in which they deliberately provacateur women through on-line harassment and defamation to file lawsuits.  Judges like Longstreth work to destroy such pro per cases, and then the woman is stuck with the other party's attorney bill!  It's a money making operation for male attorneys to put it simply.

It is obvious to me these men believe they are superior to women that they are above the law free to harass at will, while I have no rights whatsoever. I'm don't have any rights in these men's eyes whatsoever.  When I went with tons of evidence against cyber #1, a restraining order was denied as they claimed I couldn't prove it was the person, yet the judge in Walnut Creek had issued a RO against me based on someone else's mailing from Vancouver Washington.  It's clear to me many men think they're above the law an are using the judicial system to control and dominate women whenever they can.

What's even sadder is when women come to the rescue of the bruised egos of weak, cowardly men to lie with them.  Men in general want control over the female species. Many men simply use women as vehicles and objects and then seek to destroy them when they're done with them.  We see examples of this all the time in the news of soulless men who kill off their family for whatever reason.  Kind good men are far and few these days.

Though I won my lawsuit against cyber #2, it was nonetheless based on a default judgment.  The judge in San Francisco had no choice but to award damages though I had to provide proof of such damages and support it all with a lengthy declaration to be awarded $25,136.  Had the case been contested, I would have lost because I am a woman pro per who brutal judges like Judge Longstreth and Judge Joel H. Golub just love to slaughter like a little lamb.  It took two male witnesses who testified in support of my restraining order against cyber #2, otherwise I would have lost that case too!

As a single woman, I've come to the conclusion many men are severely misguided to believe they're on the same level as God and will seek to oppress, dominate and punish especially any single, childless women who comes to their attention. Smart women learn how to play the ego game with men, but I refuse to participate.  I've since learned these guys will do whatever it takes to make sure their over bloated male egos become replenished as the self proclaimed rulers of the world and conquerors of everything in it.

What Would You Do If American Dollar Became Worthless?

According to the latest Gerald Celente video, and the United Nations report, the U.S. dollar is on its way to being worthless.  I was thinking what I would do in that situation.  I think the only thing people will be able to do is barter.














If this following video of gay workers in San Francisco is any indicator, people are going to be doing a lot of protesting over worker wages, health care and other issues a bad economy raises:






I seriously doubt any of the people in this viral Westin St. Francis hotel video will ever be able to find jobs in the hotel industry ever again!  They've also most likely have been reported to the local Littler Mendelson pro employer law firm, and all of them await restraining orders if any pattern of such visits continues.  The hotel may have already changed its policy disallowing future disruptive protests on its property.  They may call the police next time and have them all arrested for trespassing on a business property.  That's just my guess.
They all may think they're protest is creative and positive, but I'm sure the hotel and local legal professionals have strategies in place on how to deal with creative protesters in the future.  

ID Tokens Proposed by U.S. Government to Access Internet

The U.S. government is in the process of passing new laws while preparing to implement a new system for identifying Internet users.  In essence what this means is, under the appearance of cybersecurity, the government wants a reborn Internet with new infrastructure favoring a more centralized, regulated world wide web. 

Senator Joe Lieberman's proposed new legislation is modeled after China's but is considered by many to be even more stringent in its methods of regulating Internet access. 

"The true nature of the cybersecurity agenda was revealed when Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley that his 197-page Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act (PDF) legislation was part of an effort to mimic China’s control of the Internet.

'Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,' said Lieberman." - Cybersecurity Measures Will Mandate Government ID Tokens to Use the Internet - InfoWars.com

Many are predicting a temporary shut down of the Internet in the future based on a false flag cyber security threat.  Essentially, this would mean the government would manufacture a cyber security threat in order to implement its new infrastructure.

Additionally, FCC has rolled a censorship plan into its Net Neutrality scheme in a stealth attempt to impose Internet regulation.

Under the FCC’s regulatory control consumers would be forced to buy an Internet/TV/Phone connectivity box that the government approves. “Everyone will pay rates for service that the government sets. And everything passing through your Internet, TV, or phone would become subject to the FCC’s consistent regulatory whim,” writes Americans for Tax Reform’s Kelly William Cobb. -Article

Those who own web sites would be required to sign up with the government to be allowed one.  I guess my question is where is the ACLU in all this?  The ACLU was at the San Francisco gay parade last weekend, but thus far is unable to defend Americans freedoms in this most dire situation.   

My prediction is, after these new regulations are imposed, there will be an uprising of angry people.  This regulation of the Internet is going to severely affect the flow of money and ideas.  I predict it will cripple the U.S. economy even more.

No one's going to have free access to the Internet anymore because of these old Senators who have no real future in America, seeking to impose their laws on the nation's future to make their mark.  In one respect, there will no longer be evil cyberstalkers but the cost of getting rid of vermin is far too high.  

My main question is will this drastic attack on the Internet and freedom by the U.S. Government itself, and that is exactly what it is in my opinion, cause the people to rise to make changes?  Only time will tell. 

Michael Jackson's Masterful Transition Into Eternity

It's hard to believe, but an entire year has passed since Michael Jackson left our world.  Since that time, his name has been been reported to have generated $1,000,000,000!  That's right ONE BILLION DOLLARS!

Hollywood trade paper Billboard estimated Jackson's earnings in the past year have hit $1 billion, including album sales generating about $383 million and revenue from the film "This Is It" hitting nearly $400 million.

"The Official Charts Company, which compiles record sales in Britain, said Jackson sold more records than any other artist in the last 12 months.

His sales of 2.77 million albums outstripped Michael Buble's 2.0 million. Including singles, Jackson's sales in Britain reached 4.31 million for the year since his death. "Man in the Mirror" topped singles sales, followed by "Billie Jean." - Michael Jackson Fans Pay Tribute to One Billion Dollar Man - ABC News

I think Michael Jackson left our world as masterfully as anyone ever has in entertainment's history.  His planned "This is It" concert and timing of coming back and rebounding so strongly in his career and all the attention it generated was masterful in its timing prior to Jackson's passing.  He had garnered much attention with his pending concert series, and left behind a wealth of rehearsal footage that became the movie.

The last time we've all witnessed such worldwide mourning over someone was Princess Di's funeral.  I personally think Jackson generated even more attention but I could be wrong.  Prior to his passing, I was unaware of how huge Michael Jackson was worldwide because the media was always downplaying his popularity as if everyone viewed him as a guilty pedophile.  The media made me think Michael Jackson was so despised he was driven out of the United States.

This video shows an upcoming superstar true talent performing on the Sonny & Cher show in the 70's.

Perhaps there were many people who hated Michael Jackson.  When you're so well known, I tend to think this is common.  People look for scapegoats for their own personal inadequacies and become jealous of all the attention and love heaped on one person, especially among women fans.

When I was a kid, I took Michael Jackson for granted because in the Motown era there were many talented singers and performers.  In fact, I practically took it for granted the day the Jackson 5 walked passed me singing ABC at my local grocery store in Baldwin Hills California in 1971.  I was too young to think it was a rare opportunity since I lived near Hollywood where celebrities were plentiful.

Over the years I came to understand the depth of Jackson's talents far exceeded them all, even Diana Ross who was at one time a huge star.  It really was the creative dancing that took Michael Jackson to new plateaus few reach.  Jackson's signature moon walk dance during his infamous Billie Jean performance at the Motown Anniversary Special in the 1980's was a huge launching pad enabling him to reach new heights.

Many of us remember Michael Jackson in our childhoods and in the early 80's for his moonwalk and Thriller album and nothing more.  If that's so, there's nothing wrong with that at all.  Those times were when his talents shined most because the music was greatly produced, the musicians top notch.  After the early 80's many of us felt the music industry began to falter and hasn't recovered since.  In a recent post, I disclosed the music industry is on the verge of collapse because most agree the quality of talent and music just isn't there anymore.  Maybe the talent is there, but it's not being captured in an appealing way to most.  It's now all corporate garbage music on a large scale.

There will never be another like Michael Jackson ever again.  Anyone who tries to reach such a high plateau as a performer, will never make it to that level ever again.  I guarantee it!  Any attempt to do so will be contrived and only perhaps a television sensation unworthy of such notoriety.   One of the reasons for this, is our culture is rapidly changing and there is no real money to promote and springboard such a superstar as was before.  Our entire world economic system is on the verge of collapse.  In the early 1980s Jackson had the support of the entire music industry machine.  In other words, Jackson was considered to be "the one" like in the Matrix movie. Jackson worked hard and was well lodged in music history prior to the second stage of his young adult career.

It's too bad and tragic Jackson had to suffer through such a horrific times when the public as focused on him for something other than his being one of the greatest entertainers ever.  Regardless, it's clear he overcame it all quite masterfully.

A Corrupt San Diego Superior Court Awarded Edmond Wollmann Legal Fees At Secret Hearing

**UPDATE** See Exposing the Illuminati in Hollywood Films - My Letter To Entertainment Attorney Joseph F. Hart Detailing Rick Lazzarini's Using My Life For His Horror Movie Project - August 10, 2012

In my opinion, there's something seriously wrong with the San Diego Superior Court system.  My experience was they are highly political, sexist and don't necessarily follow statutory law or procedures.  I'm referring particularly to Judge Robert C. Longstreth, who looks as gay as any gay man in San Francisco I've ever worked with.  Notice the rather inhuman glazed look in this Judge's eyes (the photo was since taken down on the site I linked to and is unavailable)?  These are the eyes that aided and abetted Edmond Wollmann while seeking to severely punish me for filing a lawsuit in pro per.  I had plenty of corroborating evidence to back up my claims.  Judge Longstreth was appointed to the bench by Terminator actor, Governor Arnold Schwarznegger in 2008.

Like the Terminator, this judge was predatory of my future in his statements at a hearing and was brutal and sadistic in his intent to punish me for filing my lawsuit he asked me to withdraw on record.  He stated he believed I had the "wrong man".   Yet this judge wasn't even overseeing the lawsuit though he seemed desperate to have it moved to his jurisdiction in the East County court.  This judge's hearing was for another case Mr. Wollmann filed in another county of San Diego.  It was filed in pro per by Mr. Wollmann due to my contacting the La Mesa Police over a gun related death threat. The judge issued statements "on record" for the Central court to follow in my case.  Prior to my contacting the police, I also contacted the SFPD and the San Diego District Attorney's office. I was working through the system and not harassing Mr. Wollmann of my own accord whatsoever.

This Judge Longstreth is a total bully who acted as if he was Mr. Wollmann's attorney at a hearing, arguing over petty issues of a few miles of driving to the Central Court rather then the East Court.  This judge disregarded all of my response motions and didn't appear to read or acknowledge any of them in my defense of fraudulent claims I had harassed Edmond Wollmann.  Judge Longstreth is typical of judges these days who abuse their discretion and overlook statutes due to overt sexism and gender bias against women falsely accused by their predators.   

A Little Background on How It All Started

I sent two cease and desist letters to Mr. Wollmann prior to filing my lawsuit that went unanswered.  I had good reason to believe he was involved in sending me obscene messages and posting defamation on a blog, including having me in handcuffs and behind bars accusing me of a multitude of crimes.  The judge didn't care what evidence I had.  He issued a statement at the hearing that was forwarded by Mr. Wollmann to the Central court judge.  The Central court judge Charles R. Hayes then became very hard on me and my case.

I ultimately dismissed the case but they called a secret hearing to issue Mr. Wollmann his legal fees for the case.  The secret meeting wasn't on calendar because the case was dismissed.  Yet the judge made sure to use the opportunity to benefit Mr. Wollmann at what is called the discovery hearing a few days prior to trial.  There was no trial scheduled, so there should not have been such a hearing.  They created the hearing from thin air to accommodate Mr. Wollmann's request for legal fees.

Cyber Stalkers' Activities Have Drained My Savings Account & Affected My Income Considerably

Unfortunately, due to the cyber stalker's activities, my finances have dwindled considerably and there is not any money I can provide to Mr. Wollmann.  He will not be successful in obtaining money from me because I have limited income thanks to he and his sidekick's phantom's on-line activities.  I have little assets as well.  There is really nothing Mr. Wollmann can do to successfully collect on his judgment, as there is nothing I can do to collect $25,000 I was awarded for another cyber stalker's activities.  They're broke and so am I.  When people have no money, there's nothing you can do to collect it.  Most lawsuit judgments go uncollected simply for the fact people have no money.

Cruel Judges in San Diego Sought to Punish Me For My Valid Lawsuit! Ordered Me To Pay!

I spoke with an attorney familiar with my case, a Cathy Kazemi in San Diego who said the sanctions issued against me for my discovery of "Ewollmann@aol.com" was highly abnormal.  Not only were they abnormal, the judge violated the Discovery Act.  I did not abuse the discovery process to obtain the identity of a man through AOL who clearly harassed me with emails and posted defamation on the Internet.  Attorney Kazemi told me she had never heard of a judge ever sanctioning a pro per over a discovery request before. This clearly happened due to the politics involved between two judges.  Judge Longstreth was making some serious statements against me in the court room that indicated to me he fully believed a public nuisance, trespass convicted individual who admitted at a court hearing he spent all of his time on the Internet.  He believed Mr. Wollmann and disregarded me all together indicating prejudice and bias.

When a court is overtly political and doesn't consider two sides of an issue, it is clear it is corrupt.  The Court of Judge Longstreth, who was since transferred to the Family Court in San Diego, should be highly scrutinized by the public and those who appear before him for any overtly sexist political decisions that are extreme.  Apparently Judge Longstreth has had issues with women in his personal life that he's looking to dump on them whenever he is able.  From my and other female experiences, gay men especially seem to have much underlying hostility and anger towards the opposite sex for obvious reasons.  It's not like it is on Will & Grace, a highly fictional sitcom.

Judge Charles R. Hayes who took over where Judge Longstreth left off with his statement, carried out his intent and issued harsh penalties against me, though I withdrew my lawsuit.  Judge Hayes had supported Judge Longstreths campaign and is listed as an endorser.  I maintain Edmond Wollmann's on-line reputation, admissions of frivolous complaints to the FBI over Google rankings, admission to being on the Internet all the time, and criminal convictions, all supported good reason for my lawsuit, not to mention his ignoring my cease and desist letters and even evading my process server.

California's Imminent Bankruptcy & Collapse

When the State of California collapses, not to mention America, the good part of it will be it won't be able to afford these corrupt judge's salaries and bloated pensions. These male judges a oppressive to women particularly.  All I wanted to do originally was be a singer on  a cruise ship.  It all started when a cyber stalker wanted to mock me for my video singing with my back to a camera in my studio converted from a walk-in closet.  It was all so ridiculous how these closet gay men made an issue of my singing video.  A previous cyber stalker's work (I was awarded a judgment for) provided impetus for momentum of a gay men's gang up mentality on a woman. They should go watch Boy George and George Michael's videos and leave me the hell alone!

After seeing a photograph of Judge Longstreth, and experiencing his overt sexism, I honestly question his sexuality.  Is he one of those guys in the closet who uses women?  He sided with Mr. Wollmann and entirely disregarded my motions and statement of facts, because he most likely favors men.  Of course, that's just my opinion.  I certainly wouldn't want to be accused of defaming Judge Longstreth, whose a public figure. 

www.judgelongstreth.com