Surprise! Attorneys Think Nothing of Perjuring Themselves

Yesterday I participated in my first Court Call regarding a Motion to Compel Discovery I filed in San Diego Court last month. It's really revolutionary that judges allow people to dial into their court for $50. Instead of paying an airfare, you can have someone file the papers and then call in to your hearing depending on if the court participates in court calling.

Unfortunately, I didn't discover until too late I needed one more document, a Declaration, to complete the Motion. I tried filing it the morning of the court hearing, but it was too late. This missive gave the opposing counsel an opening to lie in court claiming he never received any of my correspondence about discovery. It doesn't even matter if he didn't get my letters, he was still late and I have the evidence recorded in a deposition on September 15, 2009. I could refile the motion and prove I didn't have the discovery if I wanted to.

The interesting part of this story is Wollmann's attorney didn't have to lie whatsoever. He didn't have to claim I never sent him any request because my not providing a declaration with the motion made everything moot. The attorney was deliberately lying as psychological warfare in court. He also created an illusion he wasn't late on getting discovery to me when in fact it was definitely late.

All this info is still useful as it gave me a little preview of how the attorney for Edmond Wollmann is willing to commit perjury on his client's behalf. I have the header from the email forwarded to him with the discovery deadline pdf. The letter I sent by US mail was never returned. He definitely got the requests. Next time opposing counsel will be process served to avoid any of these kinds of dirty tactics claiming he never got my extension of the deadline. They were late by two weeks to provide discovery and never communicated about it with me.

The topic of lying in America has been addressed in recent newspaper and magazine articles primarily due to the recent film The Invention of Lying. What lying mostly boils down to is money, the root of all evil. Would Wollmann's attorney be in court lying if he wasn't being paid? Wollmann's attorney is his whore. If they think they're eventually going to charge me for these legal expenses, their plum out of their minds.

Next time there's a problem with getting discovery to me within the 30 day time allotted by law, I will file another Motion to Compel with the required declaration and it will most definitely be approved by the Judge.

As far as the habitual lying, it's true that lies eventually trip people up. Subpoena results don't lie however.

Night Stalker Richard Ramirez Still Among Us Twenty Years Later

While I'm on the subject of torture (see my last post), I thought I'd pose a question since a story came out at SFGate.com yesterday about serial killer Richard Ramirez. Ramirez was the Night Stalker who terrorized primarily Southern California back in the early 1980's. Apparently Ramirez also stayed in San Francisco in which a cold case murder was recently reopened.

It took another twenty years before San Francisco police reopened a case of the murder of Mei Leung, in which they are currently seeking Ramirez' DNA. The first question that came to mind was, why is Richard Ramirez still alive on death row? Why does California allow this serial killer to live for twenty + years after his conviction? Why are they allowing this monster Ramirez who killed and even tortured over a dozen people to remain well fed and taken care of in our world?

Richard Ramirez committed his heinous murders way back in the early to mid 1980's. He was convicted in 1989. Why is he still on death row? Do the people who oversee this death penalty think it somehow serves our society to allow these kind of men to exist for 20 years after they were sentenced? How can this be considered the death penalty? Richard Ramirez shouldn't be living in our world right now. I want to know why he's still among us.

Could it be because Ramirez was such a high profile media figure those in the system were hoping for a new murder to come up so they could rehash it all over again and make tons of money in doing so? It seems to me they kept him alive in order to resurrect him so they could squeeze more money out for their legal system. This guy Ramirez should have been put to death a long time ago. The fact they're talking a possible trial over the murder does support my theory it's about money. The man was convicted to death. Why would they need a trial again?

• LA Times Article
• Richard Ramirez on Wikipedia
  

U.S. Musicians Concerned Their Music Used as Torture Device

I don't think a few of these musicians and rap artists who are inquiring as to torture in the use of their music at Guantanamo care about it being torture to many Americans' ears. In order to go out into public one must endure their musical garbage forced on the population each day. For many such as myself the music is pure torture, and I'm not kidding!

It's a good thing musicians care about their music being used to torture Guantanamo detainees. While their at it caring so much, they should also be aware many people such as myself have to literally run out of stores with their hands over their ears, or purchase ear plugs for public places due to the horrendous sounds they produce that are unfit for human consumption.

"From the National Security Archive. Washington, DC, October 22, 2009 - On behalf of a coalition of U.S. and international musicians, including R.E.M., Pearl Jam, Tom Morello and Jackson Brown, the National Security Archive today filed a series of FOIA petitions requesting the full declassification of secret U.S. documentation on the strategy of using music as an interrogation device at Guantanamo and other detention centers. The Archive also posted several declassified documents and published reports that refer to the use of "loud" music to "create futility" in uncooperative detainees at Guantanamo.

A 2004 Defense Department report on abuses at the military base in Cuba, for example, stated that the "futility technique included the playing of Metallica, Britney Spears and Rap music." Archive analysts filed the FOIA requests with the CIA, U.S. Special Operations Command, and the FBI, among other agencies, requesting all documentation pertaining to how the music was chosen and the specific role it played in interrogations of detainees at the Guantanamo base. "At Guantanamo, the U.S. government turned a jukebox into an instrument of torture," said Thomas Blanton, the Archive's executive director. "The musicians and the public have the right to know how an expression of popular culture was transformed into an enhanced interrogation technique".

" Visit the National Security Archive Web site for more information: http://www.nsarchive.org

Nutjob Cyber #2 Harasses Law Firm of Parker Stanbury LLP

Last night I got a frantic phone call from attorney Ric Mercardo at the law firm of Parker Stanbury LLP. Mercado said the guy who he had only drafted a cease and desist letter to back in July has been repeatedly calling him. Cyber is apparently calling to complain about my allegedly posting stuff about him! Funny, I don't recall writing about Cyber #2 in a long time and certainly not by name. Cyber got the attorney's name from an exhibit I provided to the court.

Maybe it was the LAWSUIT I filed against the Cyber on October 16, 2009 for intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation that made the Cyber somehow think it was a post on my blog? On Sunday when Cyber shut the door in the server's face and wouldn't accept the lawsuit, was that my posting about him? I'm not aware of any article I've written about the nutjob in a long time, and certainly not ascribing to his name. It apparently exists all inside his head and that's a scary, scary thing.



Cyber #2 is so delusional and out of his mind, he doesn't heed when the attorney tells him "I'm not representing her." According to Mercado, he's been contacted three times now. Instead of calling attorneys to harass them, maybe Cyber #2 should get a grip on reality and get his own attorney? He'll certainly need one considering I've collected most of my discovery already that will prove to a jury he's guilty as hell. While he's at it Cyber #2 should get medicated by a psychiatrist because he's clearly imagining my posting stuff about him.

Obama Ready to Cede US Sovreignty to World Government

In December, 2009 Obama's set to cede US sovereignty by signing a climate treaty in which 1. a world government is going to be created, 2. to transfer wealth from countries of west to third world countries in satisfaction of a climate debt, 3. purposes of enforcement will be carried out. The treaty will overrule the US Constitution's powers forever.

It's interesting to note what Obama's reading which says a lot about where his head is at. He's reading Fareed Zakaria's, The Post-American World. Now we know why Obama had problems with saluting the American flag and wearing a flag pin. (I see there's some kind of pin on him in this photo though, can't really see what it is.

Americans have been fooled by Obama and face a grim future of world government rule in which tyranny will take hold of the world. Americans are asleep at the wheel too busy watching their sports or doing video games to realize America's about to end.

This video by a global climate expert Lord Christopher Monckton is intriguing and worth watching. Meanwhile latest news on the dollar being dropped by countries should be enough to send alarms across the sleeping nation to wake them the hell up. Alarm bells should be going off everywhere in this country right now!

• Iran set to drop US dollar for oil exchange
• Russia Ready to Abandon Dollar in Oil, Gas Trade with China

What Happens When Someone Commits Perjury Against Me?

The penalty under perjury clause which allegedly causes people to tell the truth has proven to be a farce time and time again in our court system. Most people know by now, unless it's a high profile important case, a lower court won't bother to question perjury testimony. This means it's up to the accused (and their attorney if they have one) to eventually bring the truth out. It may be too late at one point of a particular battle, but the fact there was damaging deception and a series of lies can ultimately be brought out by other means.

I'm quite relieved that I now have the legal tools and skills available to me to rat out those who commit egregious perjury against me. I have the legal skills of filing lawsuits, conducting depositions and using subpoenas, even those records I seek from out of state! For instance, I was able to get AT&T's records of their customer's Internet account that also proved they were dishonest during a deposition. I gave AT&T the time and IP address and voila! They faxed over their customer's name and address within 30 days of my subpoena request.

I don't need an attorney to make things happen. The average person on the other end as a defendant will have to invest thousands of dollars in an attorney. So you want to quash that subpoena because you're a little embarrassed of your on-line behavior? You'll have to pay an attorney to try to negotiate who may ultimately have to file a motion to quash the subpoena. It will cost you $2,000 to quash a subpoena at the very least.

Anyone who thinks they can walk into a court room and fool the judge with perjury against me will be sorry because I won't hesitate to drag them through muddy legal waters. I will subpoena records, I will conduct depositions of themselves and non-party witnesses, I will do whatever I need to do to rat out the liars and bring them to justice.

So I guess the moral of the story is, if you really want to accelerate the problems in your life, go into court and lie about me. If you want to pay out $15,000 in attorney's fees in a matter of a few months, just keep up the perjury and lies because I can make it happen for you. Imagine the wonderful cruise you could have taken for $15 K the attorney will take on your behalf!

A Little Secret About Health Care in America

For those who haven't figured it out yet, if you don't have health insurance it's a good thing. It means many good hospitals will give you free care and write it off. If you're self-employed, unemployed or have no insurance, good hospitals will treat you for emergencies and serious injuries, ask for a little money you can pay, and write off the rest.

I've heard a few stories about free hospital care for serious burns requiring a two week hospital stay for just $5,000. Another story was recently brought to my attention of a man who needed heart surgery who had no insurance. He got free care from Stanford's hospital.

If you have health insurance and a job you'll end up paying more in monthly fees and for deductions for long hospital care. Not a good thing. Check it out, there's free health care in America already. The middle class needs to get a grip on reality.

Revisiting My 2008 Hives

I had an extreme case of hives last year I'll never forget. This condition I hadn't experienced since I was 13 was brought on by stress. I actually had a 6 month old frozen corn chicken dog prior to the outbreak but seriously doubt that caused it.

At one point I thought my body was on fire and I wasn't going to survive. I actually considered checking into the burn ward of a local hospital. Here are the gross photos of my poor body being engulfed in virtual flames. The condition lasted a few days.

Click to enlarge photos. I don't know where the bruise came from either.

Carly Simon Sues Starbucks Over Clouds In Her Coffee

I'm feeling bad for 70's/80's singer Carly Simon because she's apparently in la la land about her marketability in today's music market. Carly apparently expected Starbucks to promote her CD This Kind of Love like they're her record label. Apparently because Starbucks the coffee company didn't treat Carly like the 70's and 80's hit songwriter she's accustomed to, she sued them.

If I were Carly, here's what I would have done. I would have promoted the concept of her hit "You're So Vain" with her memorable lyric "clouds in my coffee" to promote Starbucks and the various narcissism organizations. Narcissism is on the rise in America in epidemic proportions. Books are being published, blogs are being created on the topic. Carly could have fit in with promoting a good cause along with Starbucks coffee to promote awareness of the narcissism epidemic.

Apparently Carly couldn't think of the N idea because she's still apparently narcissistic herself to think she's marketable and competitive in today's music market. Her music is outdated and her voice is shot. She apparently didn't work as hard and tour enough in her career to connect with a large enough fan base.

I don't mean to sound too harsh on Carly Simon, but her glory days are over and she should get over herself now. I mean, c'mon, Carly Simon was never that great of a singer to begin with, especially according to today's standards. It was a combination of her talent, beauty, songwriting and social connections that made her successful in the 70's and 80's.

Today, Carly would do herself a tremendous honor by getting upcoming singers to perform her material while removing herself from the spotlight. Carly looks like a tragedy about to happen.

Carly Simon Sues Starbucks Over Failure of This Kind of Love

Lowest Approval Rating for California Governor in 50 Years

In a true sign of trouble brewing in California, Governor Schwarzenegger's recent approval ratings were polled at a 50 year low - 27% only taking a backseat to Gray Davis' 22% in 2003. The California legislature got even lower ratings at 13%. These are dismal numbers that reflect voter's frustrations over the mismanagement of California's economy.

There's a good chance Governor Schwarzenegger could become the first governor in US history whose state went bankrupt. Way to go Arnie!

One can observe in the type of laws the Governor signed yesterday as to why California's in trouble:

* Make it a crime, punishable by a fine of up to $50,000, for a person to take and sell unauthorized photos of celebrities and others or their children in "personal or familial activity." AB 524, Assemblywoman Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles.)

* Prohibit elective cosmetic surgery unless the patient first is cleared by a physical examination. AB 1116, Assemblywoman Wilmer Amina Carter (D-Rialto).

* Proclaim gay rights activist Harvey Milk's May 22 birthday as a day of recognition and encourage schools to consider commemorating his life. SB 54, Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco).

* Create a pilot program in four counties, including Los Angeles, that will permit first-time DUI offenders to drive only if they pass a test on a breath-testing device installed on every vehicle they own. AB 91, Assemblyman Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles).

So these are the kind of laws the legislature's coming up with at this dire time? Harvey Milk day? Cosmetic surgery issues? Celebrity photos?

• California Voters Disgusted with Governor, Legislature